mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

QUBIQ: Uncertainty Quantification for Biomedical Image Segmentation Challenge

arXiv 2405.18435 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2024eess.IV cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uncertainty in medical image segmentation tasks, especially inter-rater variability, arising from differences in interpretations and annotations by various experts, presents a significant challenge in achieving consistent and reliable image segmentation. This variability not only reflects the inherent complexity and subjective nature of medical image interpretation but also directly impacts the development and evaluation of automated segmentation algorithms. Accurately modeling and quantifying this variability is essential for enhancing the robustness and clinical applicability of these algorithms. We report the set-up and summarize the benchmark results of the Quantification of Uncertainties in Biomedical Image Quantification Challenge (QUBIQ), which was organized in conjunction with International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2020 and 2021. The challenge focuses on the uncertainty quantification of medical image segmentation which considers the omnipresence of inter-rater variability in imaging datasets. The large collection of images with multi-rater annotations features various modalities such as MRI and CT; various organs such as the brain, prostate, kidney, and pancreas; and different image dimensions 2D-vs-3D. A total of 24 teams submitted different solutions to the problem, combining various baseline models, Bayesian neural networks, and ensemble model techniques. The obtained results indicate the importance of the ensemble models, as well as the need for further research to develop efficient 3D methods for uncertainty quantification methods in 3D segmentation tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2024.

Builds on

12 of 28 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Imagescited by 281
  2. 2018Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networkscited by 280
  3. 2018Exploring Uncertainty Measures in Deep Networks for Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection and Segmentationcited by 146
  4. 2018Uncertainty Estimates and Multi-Hypotheses Networks for Optical Flowcited by 135
  5. 2019PHiSeg: Capturing Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 128
  6. 2020Stochastic Segmentation Networks: Modelling Spatially Correlated Aleatoric Uncertaintycited by 100
  7. 2018No New-Netcited by 61
  8. 2018Bayesian QuickNAT: Model Uncertainty in Deep Whole-Brain Segmentation for Structure-wise Quality Controlcited by 39
  9. 2018Brain Tumor Segmentation using an Ensemble of 3D U-Nets and Overall Survival Prediction using Radiomic Featurescited by 33
  10. 2021Are we using appropriate segmentation metrics? Identifying correlates of human expert perception for CNN training beyond rolling the DICE coefficientcited by 26
  11. 2020Uncertainty Evaluation Metric for Brain Tumour Segmentationcited by 11
  12. 2022Approaching Peak Ground Truthcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

12 papers.