mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Flow Fields: Dense Correspondence Fields for Highly Accurate Large Displacement Optical Flow Estimation

arXiv 1508.05151 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2015cs.CVcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern large displacement optical flow algorithms usually use an initialization by either sparse descriptor matching techniques or dense approximate nearest neighbor fields. While the latter have the advantage of being dense, they have the major disadvantage of being very outlier prone as they are not designed to find the optical flow, but the visually most similar correspondence. In this paper we present a dense correspondence field approach that is much less outlier prone and thus much better suited for optical flow estimation than approximate nearest neighbor fields. Our approach is conceptually novel as it does not require explicit regularization, smoothing (like median filtering) or a new data term, but solely our novel purely data based search strategy that finds most inliers (even for small objects), while it effectively avoids finding outliers. Moreover, we present novel enhancements for outlier filtering. We show that our approach is better suited for large displacement optical flow estimation than state-of-the-art descriptor matching techniques. We do so by initializing EpicFlow (so far the best method on MPI-Sintel) with our Flow Fields instead of their originally used state-of-the-art descriptor matching technique. We significantly outperform the original EpicFlow on MPI-Sintel, KITTI and Middlebury.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 6; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

22 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021GMFlow: Learning Optical Flow via Global Matchingcited by 324
  2. 2022Global Matching with Overlapping Attention for Optical Flow Estimationcited by 64
  3. 2023Dense Optical Tracking: Connecting the Dotscited by 58
  4. 2025Dynamic Point Maps: A Versatile Representation for Dynamic 3D Reconstructioncited by 43
  5. 2022MDFlow: Unsupervised Optical Flow Learning by Reliable Mutual Knowledge Distillationcited by 10
  6. 2024Rethinking RAFT for Efficient Optical Flowcited by 8
  7. 2023SplatFlow: Learning Multi-frame Optical Flow via Splattingcited by 7
  8. 2023FocusFlow: Boosting Key-Points Optical Flow Estimation for Autonomous Drivingcited by 5
  9. 2021Target Detection and Segmentation in Circular-Scan Synthetic-Aperture-Sonar Images using Semi-Supervised Convolutional Encoder-Decoderscited by 3
  10. 2021Normalized Convolution Upsampling for Refined Optical Flow Estimationcited by 3
  11. 2023Attentive Multimodal Fusion for Optical and Scene Flowcited by 3
  12. 2024Benchmarking the Robustness of Optical Flow Estimation to Corruptionscited by 3
10 more
  1. 2022Fusing Frame and Event Vision for High-speed Optical Flow for Edge Applicationcited by 2
  2. 2022DnSwin: Toward Real-World Denoising via Continuous Wavelet Sliding-Transformercited by 2
  3. 2025Segment Anything for Video: A Comprehensive Review of Video Object Segmentation and Tracking from Past to Futurecited by 2
  4. 2026Triangular Consistency as a Universal Constraint for Learning Optical Flowcited by 1
  5. 2021Efficient data-driven encoding of scene motion using Eccentricitycited by 0
  6. 2021External-Memory Networks for Low-Shot Learning of Targets in Forward-Looking-Sonar Imagerycited by 0
  7. 2022FlowNAS: Neural Architecture Search for Optical Flow Estimationcited by 0
  8. 2022Learning Omnidirectional Flow in 360-degree Video via Siamese Representationcited by 0
  9. 2023Optical Flow Estimation in 360^circ Videos: Dataset, Model and Applicationcited by 0
  10. 2024Rethink Predicting the Optical Flow with the Kinetics Perspectivecited by 0