EEL: Efficiently Encoding Lattices for Reranking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Standard decoding approaches for conditional text generation tasks typically search for an output hypothesis with high model probability, but this may not yield the best hypothesis according to human judgments of quality. Reranking to optimize for "downstream" metrics can better optimize for quality, but many metrics of interest are computed with pre-trained language models, which are slow to apply to large numbers of hypotheses. We explore an approach for reranking hypotheses by using Transformers to efficiently encode lattices of generated outputs, a method we call EEL. With a single Transformer pass over the entire lattice, we can approximately compute a contextualized representation of each token as if it were only part of a single hypothesis in isolation. We combine this approach with a new class of token-factored rerankers (TFRs) that allow for efficient extraction of high reranker-scoring hypotheses from the lattice. Empirically, our approach incurs minimal degradation error compared to the exponentially slower approach of encoding each hypothesis individually. When applying EEL with TFRs across three text generation tasks, our results show both substantial speedup compared to naive reranking and often better performance on downstream metrics than comparable approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2023.
Builds on
30 of 42 references.
References · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
- 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
- 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 793
18 more
- 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 598
- 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 374
- 2019Handling Divergent Reference Texts when Evaluating Table-to-Text Generationcited by 119
- 2020Investigating Pretrained Language Models for Graph-to-Text Generationcited by 117
- 2021High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metricscited by 104
- 2022RankGen: Improving Text Generation with Large Ranking Modelscited by 72
- 2022SummaReranker: A Multi-Task Mixture-of-Experts Re-ranking Framework for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 61
- 2021Machine Translation Decoding beyond Beam Searchcited by 55
- 2022Quality-Aware Decoding for Neural Machine Translationcited by 49
- 2020Energy-Based Reranking: Improving Neural Machine Translation Using Energy-Based Modelscited by 44
- 2021Lattice-BERT: Leveraging Multi-Granularity Representations in Chinese Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 19
- 2019Lattice Transformer for Speech Translationcited by 15
- 2021A New Approach to Overgenerating and Scoring Abstractive Summariescited by 13
- 2019Self-Attentional Models for Lattice Inputscited by 12
- 2021Stage-wise Fine-tuning for Graph-to-Text Generationcited by 11
- 2021A Parallelizable Lattice Rescoring Strategy with Neural Language Modelscited by 10
- 2021Massive-scale Decoding for Text Generation using Latticescited by 8
- 2021Lattention: Lattice-attention in ASR rescoringcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024QUEST: Quality-Aware Metropolis-Hastings Sampling for Machine Translationcited by 16
- 2024Reranking Laws for Language Generation: A Communication-Theoretic Perspectivecited by 3
- 2024A Bayesian Optimization Approach to Machine Translation Rerankingcited by 2
- 2025Early-Exit and Instant Confidence Translation Quality Estimationcited by 2
- 2025Early-Exit and Instant Confidence Translation Quality Estimation20 Feb 2025
- 2024A Bayesian Optimization Approach to Machine Translation Reranking14 Nov 2024
- 2024Reranking Laws for Language Generation: A Communication-Theoretic Perspective11 Sep 2024
- 2024QUEST: Quality-Aware Metropolis-Hastings Sampling for Machine Translation28 May 2024