mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Entropy Controllable Direct Preference Optimization

arXiv 2411.07595 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 4

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

In the post-training of large language models (LLMs), Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is an effective approach to achieve generation aligned with human preferences. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) allows for policy training with a simple binary cross-entropy loss without a reward model. The objective of DPO is regularized by reverse KL divergence that encourages mode-seeking fitting to the reference policy. Nonetheless, we indicate that minimizing reverse KL divergence could fail to capture a mode of the reference distribution, which may hurt the policy's performance. Based on this observation, we propose a simple modification to DPO, H-DPO, which allows for control over the entropy of the resulting policy, enhancing the distribution's sharpness and thereby enabling mode-seeking fitting more effectively. In our experiments, we show that H-DPO outperformed DPO across various tasks, demonstrating superior results in pass@k evaluations for mathematical tasks. Moreover, H-DPO is simple to implement, requiring only minor modifications to the loss calculation of DPO, which makes it highly practical and promising for wide-ranging applications in the training of LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 43 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2024.

Builds on

43 of 52 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Token-level Direct Preference Optimization18 Apr
  2. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  3. 2023Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraints28 Sep
  4. 2023Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization13 Sep
  5. 2023Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignment30 Jun
  6. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 37

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  6. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  7. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  8. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  9. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  10. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  11. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  12. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
25 more
  1. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
  2. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  3. 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,105
  4. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  5. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
  6. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
  7. 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,068
  8. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
  9. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 895
  10. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  11. 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 484
  12. 2022A Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Models of Codecited by 360
  13. 2022Making Large Language Models Better Reasoners with Step-Aware Verifiercited by 231
  14. 2024V-STaR: Training Verifiers for Self-Taught Reasonerscited by 214
  15. 2019SPoC: Search-based Pseudocode to Codecited by 176
  16. 2023Model evaluation for extreme riskscited by 167
  17. 2022Ask Me Anything: A simple strategy for prompting language modelscited by 155
  18. 2019Unifying Human and Statistical Evaluation for Natural Language Generationcited by 127
  19. 2019Imitation Learning as f-Divergence Minimizationcited by 121
  20. 2020Trading Off Diversity and Quality in Natural Language Generationcited by 94
  21. 2024Planning In Natural Language Improves LLM Search For Code Generationcited by 79
  22. 2015How (not) to Train your Generative Model: Scheduled Sampling, Likelihood, Adversary?cited by 76
  23. 2024MindStar: Enhancing Math Reasoning in Pre-trained LLMs at Inference Timecited by 40
  24. 2023Hot or Cold? Adaptive Temperature Sampling for Code Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 37
  25. 2020Non-saturating GAN training as divergence minimizationcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness
  2. 2024New Desiderata for Direct Preference Optimization
  3. 2025Pre-DPO: Improving Data Utilization in Direct Preference Optimization Using a Guiding Reference Model
  4. 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization
  5. 2024Minor DPO reject penalty to increase training robustness
  6. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Direct Preference Optimization: Datasets, Theories, Variants, and Applications
  7. 2024Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models
  8. 2024Mixed Preference Optimization: Reinforcement Learning with Data Selection and Better Reference Model