mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GCI-ViTAL: Gradual Confidence Improvement with Vision Transformers for Active Learning on Label Noise

arXiv 2411.05939 ↗First posted 8 Nov 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Active learning aims to train accurate classifiers while minimizing labeling costs by strategically selecting informative samples for annotation. This study focuses on image classification tasks, comparing AL methods on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, Food101, and the Chest X-ray datasets under varying label noise rates. We investigate the impact of model architecture by comparing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformer (ViT)-based models. Additionally, we propose a novel deep active learning algorithm, GCI-ViTAL, designed to be robust to label noise. GCI-ViTAL utilizes prediction entropy and the Frobenius norm of last-layer attention vectors compared to class-centric clean set attention vectors. Our method identifies samples that are both uncertain and semantically divergent from typical images in their assigned class. This allows GCI-ViTAL to select informative data points even in the presence of label noise while flagging potentially mislabeled candidates. Label smoothing is applied to train a model that is not overly confident about potentially noisy labels. We evaluate GCI-ViTAL under varying levels of symmetric label noise and compare it to five other AL strategies. Our results demonstrate that using ViTs leads to significant performance improvements over CNNs across all AL strategies, particularly in noisy label settings. We also find that using the semantic information of images as label grounding helps in training a more robust model under label noise. Notably, we do not perform extensive hyperparameter tuning, providing an out-of-the-box comparison that addresses the common challenge practitioners face in selecting models and active learning strategies without an exhaustive literature review on training and fine-tuning vision models on real-world application data.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2024.

Builds on

49 of 74 references.

References · 49

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  5. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  6. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  7. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  8. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  9. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  10. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  11. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,610
  12. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
37 more
  1. 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 982
  2. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 896
  3. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  4. 2022PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Modelcited by 762
  5. 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 759
  6. 2021Transformer in Transformercited by 632
  7. 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 607
  8. 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 547
  9. 2019Stand-Alone Self-Attention in Vision Modelscited by 542
  10. 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 511
  11. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  12. 2019S4L: Self-Supervised Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 335
  13. 2019On the Relationship between Self-Attention and Convolutional Layerscited by 299
  14. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  15. 2021Incorporating Convolution Designs into Visual Transformerscited by 248
  16. 2022DaViT: Dual Attention Vision Transformerscited by 174
  17. 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
  18. 2017Learning Active Learning from Datacited by 100
  19. 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Model Quantization for Deep Neural Networks in Image Classificationcited by 64
  20. 2021Active label cleaning for improved dataset quality under resource constraintscited by 44
  21. 2017Cost-Effective Active Learning for Melanoma Segmentationcited by 40
  22. 2022ViTKD: Practical Guidelines for ViT feature knowledge distillationcited by 34
  23. 2023Understanding Self-Distillation in the Presence of Label Noisecited by 20
  24. 2022Multi-task Active Learning for Pre-trained Transformer-based Modelscited by 16
  25. 2016Active Learning from Imperfect Labelerscited by 13
  26. 2024Comparing Traditional and LLM-based Search for Image Geolocationcited by 10
  27. 2021Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreements: A Geometric Perspectivecited by 9
  28. 2024Foster Adaptivity and Balance in Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 9
  29. 2017Big Universe, Big Data: Machine Learning and Image Analysis for Astronomycited by 7
  30. 2021Visual Transformer for Task-aware Active Learningcited by 7
  31. 2020Active Learning for Noisy Data Streams Using Weak and Strong Labelerscited by 6
  32. 2022An Empirical Study on the Efficacy of Deep Active Learning for Image Classificationcited by 6
  33. 2019A Frobenius norm regularization method for convolutional kernels to avoid unstable gradient problemcited by 5
  34. 2023Deep Active Learning in the Presence of Label Noise: A Surveycited by 5
  35. 2022Maximum Batch Frobenius Norm for Multi-Domain Text Classificationcited by 3
  36. 2018Probabilistic Clustering Using Maximal Matrix Norm Couplingscited by 1
  37. 2023Annotating Data for Fine-Tuning a Neural Ranker? Current Active Learning Strategies are not Better than Random Selectioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.