Comparing Traditional and LLM-based Search for Image Geolocation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Web search engines have long served as indispensable tools for information retrieval; user behavior and query formulation strategies have been well studied. The introduction of search engines powered by large language models (LLMs) suggested more conversational search and new types of query strategies. In this paper, we compare traditional and LLM-based search for the task of image geolocation, i.e., determining the location where an image was captured. Our work examines user interactions, with a particular focus on query formulation strategies. In our study, 60 participants were assigned either traditional or LLM-based search engines as assistants for geolocation. Participants using traditional search more accurately predicted the location of the image compared to those using the LLM-based search. Distinct strategies emerged between users depending on the type of assistant. Participants using the LLM-based search issued longer, more natural language queries, but had shorter search sessions. When reformulating their search queries, traditional search participants tended to add more terms to their initial queries, whereas participants using the LLM-based search consistently rephrased their initial queries.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2025LLM Agent Meets Agentic AI: Can LLM Agents Simulate Customers to Evaluate Agentic-AI-based Shopping Assistants?cited by 15
- 2025AI Sees Your Location, But With A Bias Toward The Wealthy Worldcited by 14
- 2025Benchmarking Information Retrieval Models on Complex Retrieval Taskscited by 6
- 2025Source Coverage and Citation Bias in LLM-based vs. Traditional Search Enginescited by 6
- 2025Where on Earth? A Vision-Language Benchmark for Probing Model Geolocation Skills Across Scalescited by 5
- 2024Understanding Help-Seeking Behavior of Students Using LLMs vs. Web Search for Writing SQL Queriescited by 2
- 2024GCI-ViTAL: Gradual Confidence Improvement with Vision Transformers for Active Learning on Label Noisecited by 2
- 2025Toward Reliable VLM: A Fine-Grained Benchmark and Framework for Exposure, Bias, and Inference in Korean Street Viewscited by 1
- 2025IMAIA: Interactive Maps AI Assistant for Travel Planning and Geo-Spatial Intelligencecited by 0
- 2026GeoAgent: Evaluating VLM Geolocalization Through Embodied Navigationcited by 0
- 2026GeoAgent: Evaluating VLM Geolocalization Through Embodied Navigation30 Aug 2026
- 2025Source Coverage and Citation Bias in LLM-based vs. Traditional Search Engines10 Dec 2025
- 2025Where on Earth? A Vision-Language Benchmark for Probing Model Geolocation Skills Across Scales13 Oct 2025
- 2025LLM Agent Meets Agentic AI: Can LLM Agents Simulate Customers to Evaluate Agentic-AI-based Shopping Assistants?25 Sep 2025
- 2025Benchmarking Information Retrieval Models on Complex Retrieval Tasks8 Sep 2025
- 2025IMAIA: Interactive Maps AI Assistant for Travel Planning and Geo-Spatial Intelligence9 Jul 2025
- 2025Toward Reliable VLM: A Fine-Grained Benchmark and Framework for Exposure, Bias, and Inference in Korean Street Views3 Jun 2025
- 2025AI Sees Your Location, But With A Bias Toward The Wealthy World16 Feb 2025
- 2024GCI-ViTAL: Gradual Confidence Improvement with Vision Transformers for Active Learning on Label Noise8 Nov 2024
- 2024Understanding Help-Seeking Behavior of Students Using LLMs vs. Web Search for Writing SQL Queries15 Aug 2024