mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparing Traditional and LLM-based Search for Image Geolocation

arXiv 2401.10184 ↗First posted 18 Jan 2024cs.IR cs.HCcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Web search engines have long served as indispensable tools for information retrieval; user behavior and query formulation strategies have been well studied. The introduction of search engines powered by large language models (LLMs) suggested more conversational search and new types of query strategies. In this paper, we compare traditional and LLM-based search for the task of image geolocation, i.e., determining the location where an image was captured. Our work examines user interactions, with a particular focus on query formulation strategies. In our study, 60 participants were assigned either traditional or LLM-based search engines as assistants for geolocation. Participants using traditional search more accurately predicted the location of the image compared to those using the LLM-based search. Distinct strategies emerged between users depending on the type of assistant. Participants using the LLM-based search issued longer, more natural language queries, but had shorter search sessions. When reformulating their search queries, traditional search participants tended to add more terms to their initial queries, whereas participants using the LLM-based search consistently rephrased their initial queries.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.

10 papers.