mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Causal Framework for Precision Rehabilitation

arXiv 2411.03919 ↗First posted 6 Nov 2024q-bio.QM cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Precision rehabilitation offers the promise of an evidence-based approach for optimizing individual rehabilitation to improve long-term functional outcomes. Emerging techniques, including those driven by artificial intelligence, are rapidly expanding our ability to quantify the different domains of function during rehabilitation, other encounters with healthcare, and in the community. While this seems poised to usher rehabilitation into the era of big data and should be a powerful driver of precision rehabilitation, our field lacks a coherent framework to utilize these data and deliver on this promise. We propose a framework that builds upon multiple existing pillars to fill this gap. Our framework aims to identify the Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimens (ODTR), or the decision-making strategy that takes in the range of available measurements and biomarkers to identify interventions likely to maximize long-term function. This is achieved by designing and fitting causal models, which extend the Computational Neurorehabilitation framework using tools from causal inference. These causal models can learn from heterogeneous data from different silos, which must include detailed documentation of interventions, such as using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System. The models then serve as digital twins of patient recovery trajectories, which can be used to learn the ODTR. Our causal modeling framework also emphasizes quantitatively linking changes across levels of the functioning to ensure that interventions can be precisely selected based on careful measurement of impairments while also being selected to maximize outcomes that are meaningful to patients and stakeholders. We believe this approach can provide a unifying framework to leverage growing big rehabilitation data and AI-powered measurements to produce precision rehabilitation treatments that can improve clinical outcomes.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2024.

Builds on

16 of 89 references.

References · 16

  1. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  2. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  3. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
  4. 2022Causal Machine Learning: A Survey and Open Problemscited by 110
  5. 2022MyoSuite -- A contact-rich simulation suite for musculoskeletal motor controlcited by 80
  6. 2023Causal Component Analysiscited by 56
  7. 2023Publicly Shareable Clinical Large Language Model Built on Synthetic Clinical Notescited by 51
  8. 2023Leveraging sparse and shared feature activations for disentangled representation learningcited by 32
  9. 2024Differentiable Biomechanics Unlocks Opportunities for Markerless Motion Capturecited by 18
  10. 2023Improved Trajectory Reconstruction for Markerless Pose Estimationcited by 12
  11. 2024Fusing uncalibrated IMUs and handheld smartphone video to reconstruct knee kinematicscited by 6
  12. 2023Self-Supervised Learning of Gait-Based Biomarkerscited by 5
4 more
  1. 2022Learning Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes Using Causal Tree Methods in Medicinecited by 4
  2. 2022Measuring hand use in the home after cervical spinal cord injury using egocentric videocited by 3
  3. 2023Modeling Complex Disease Trajectories using Deep Generative Models with Semi-Supervised Latent Processescited by 2
  4. 2024Neural Circuit Architectural Priors for Quadruped Locomotioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.