mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Inevitable Trade-off between Watermark Strength and Speculative Sampling Efficiency for Language Models

arXiv 2410.20418 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2024cs.CR cs.AIcited by 8

On the map: Efficient LLM inference and serving → Speculative decoding

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models are probabilistic models, and the process of generating content is essentially sampling from the output distribution of the language model. Existing watermarking techniques inject watermarks into the generated content without altering the output quality. On the other hand, existing acceleration techniques, specifically speculative sampling, leverage a draft model to speed up the sampling process while preserving the output distribution. However, there is no known method to simultaneously accelerate the sampling process and inject watermarks into the generated content. In this paper, we investigate this direction and find that the integration of watermarking and acceleration is non-trivial. We prove a no-go theorem, which states that it is impossible to simultaneously maintain the highest watermark strength and the highest sampling efficiency. Furthermore, we propose two methods that maintain either the sampling efficiency or the watermark strength, but not both. Our work provides a rigorous theoretical foundation for understanding the inherent trade-off between watermark strength and sampling efficiency in accelerating the generation of watermarked tokens for large language models. We also conduct numerical experiments to validate our theoretical findings and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Speculative decoding, one of 12 directions in Efficient LLM inference and serving. Builds on 36 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2024.

Builds on

36 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024TriForce: Lossless Acceleration of Long Sequence Generation with Hierarchical Speculative Decoding18 Apr
  2. 2024Lossless Acceleration of Large Language Model via Adaptive N-gram Parallel Decoding10 Apr
  3. 2024EAGLE: Speculative Sampling Requires Rethinking Feature Uncertainty26 Jan
  4. 2024Medusa: Simple LLM Inference Acceleration Framework with Multiple Decoding Heads19 Jan
  5. 2024Multi-Candidate Speculative Decoding12 Jan
  6. 2023PaSS: Parallel Speculative Sampling22 Nov
  7. 2023REST: Retrieval-Based Speculative Decoding14 Nov
  8. 2023DistillSpec: Improving Speculative Decoding via Knowledge Distillation12 Oct
  9. 2023Accelerating LLM Inference with Staged Speculative Decoding8 Aug
  10. 2023Accelerating Large Language Model Decoding with Speculative Sampling2 Feb
  11. 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decoding30 Nov

Other references · 25

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  3. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,292
  4. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,049
  5. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 725
  6. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 320
  7. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Textcited by 299
  8. 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 226
  9. 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 189
  10. 2022Pretrained Language Models for Text Generation: A Surveycited by 122
  11. 2023A Semantic Invariant Robust Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 112
  12. 2023Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 111
13 more
  1. 2023Three Bricks to Consolidate Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 84
  2. 2023Robust Multi-bit Natural Language Watermarking through Invariant Featurescited by 82
  3. 2023A Robust Semantics-based Watermark for Large Language Model against Paraphrasingcited by 82
  4. 2023Watermarking Text Generated by Black-Box Language Modelscited by 76
  5. 2024Adaptive Text Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 67
  6. 2023Inference with Reference: Lossless Acceleration of Large Language Modelscited by 65
  7. 2024A Statistical Framework of Watermarks for Large Language Models: Pivot, Detection Efficiency and Optimal Rulescited by 57
  8. 2021CoProtector: Protect Open-Source Code against Unauthorized Training Usage with Data Poisoningcited by 47
  9. 2021Tracing Text Provenance via Context-Aware Lexical Substitutioncited by 45
  10. 2023Did You Train on My Dataset? Towards Public Dataset Protection with Clean-Label Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 37
  11. 2023CodeMark: Imperceptible Watermarking for Code Datasets against Neural Code Completion Modelscited by 34
  12. 2023Embarrassingly Simple Text Watermarkscited by 29
  13. 2023Watermarking Text Data on Large Language Models for Dataset Copyrightcited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Optimized Couplings for Watermarking Large Language Models
  2. 2023A Resilient and Accessible Distribution-Preserving Watermark for Large Language Models
  3. 2025DMark: Order-Agnostic Watermarking for Diffusion Large Language Models
  4. 2023WaterBench: Towards Holistic Evaluation of Watermarks for Large Language Models
  5. 2023Baselines for Identifying Watermarked Large Language Models
  6. 2024Theoretically Grounded Framework for LLM Watermarking: A Distribution-Adaptive Approach
  7. 2024Can Watermarking Large Language Models Prevent Copyrighted Text Generation and Hide Training Data?
  8. 2023On the Learnability of Watermarks for Language Models