mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Did You Train on My Dataset? Towards Public Dataset Protection with Clean-Label Backdoor Watermarking

arXiv 2303.11470 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2023cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 37

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The huge supporting training data on the Internet has been a key factor in the success of deep learning models. However, this abundance of public-available data also raises concerns about the unauthorized exploitation of datasets for commercial purposes, which is forbidden by dataset licenses. In this paper, we propose a backdoor-based watermarking approach that serves as a general framework for safeguarding public-available data. By inserting a small number of watermarking samples into the dataset, our approach enables the learning model to implicitly learn a secret function set by defenders. This hidden function can then be used as a watermark to track down third-party models that use the dataset illegally. Unfortunately, existing backdoor insertion methods often entail adding arbitrary and mislabeled data to the training set, leading to a significant drop in performance and easy detection by anomaly detection algorithms. To overcome this challenge, we introduce a clean-label backdoor watermarking framework that uses imperceptible perturbations to replace mislabeled samples. As a result, the watermarking samples remain consistent with the original labels, making them difficult to detect. Our experiments on text, image, and audio datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework effectively safeguards datasets with minimal impact on original task performance. We also show that adding just 1% of watermarking samples can inject a traceable watermarking function and that our watermarking samples are stealthy and look benign upon visual inspection.

Key facts. Cited by 37 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2023.

Builds on

23 of 50 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  5. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  6. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  7. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
  8. 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 439
  9. 2020Backdoor Learning: A Surveycited by 412
  10. 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 334
  11. 2020Contextualized Perturbation for Textual Adversarial Attackcited by 136
  12. 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Textscited by 126
11 more
  1. 2019TABOR: A Highly Accurate Approach to Inspecting and Restoring Trojan Backdoors in AI Systemscited by 120
  2. 2020An Embarrassingly Simple Approach for Trojan Attack in Deep Neural Networkscited by 92
  3. 2022Untargeted Backdoor Watermark: Towards Harmless and Stealthy Dataset Copyright Protectioncited by 80
  4. 2019The Odds are Odd: A Statistical Test for Detecting Adversarial Examplescited by 75
  5. 2020Radioactive data: tracing through trainingcited by 67
  6. 2022Black-box Dataset Ownership Verification via Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 57
  7. 2019ML-LOO: Detecting Adversarial Examples with Feature Attributioncited by 48
  8. 2019Word-level Textual Adversarial Attacking as Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 37
  9. 2020Open-sourced Dataset Protection via Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 30
  10. 2020Poison Attacks against Text Datasets with Conditional Adversarially Regularized Autoencodercited by 27
  11. 2020Deep Serial Number: Computational Watermarking for DNN Intellectual Property Protectioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 11; 2025: 17; 2026: 6.

37 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023A Survey of Text Watermarking in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 102
  2. 2023Domain Watermark: Effective and Harmless Dataset Copyright Protection is Closed at Handcited by 52
  3. 2024Proving membership in LLM pretraining data via data watermarkscited by 38
  4. 2024The Stronger the Diffusion Model, the Easier the Backdoor: Data Poisoning to Induce Copyright Breaches Without Adjusting Finetuning Pipelinecited by 33
  5. 2024PointNCBW: Towards Dataset Ownership Verification for Point Clouds via Negative Clean-label Backdoor Watermarkcited by 19
  6. 2024Towards Reliable Verification of Unauthorized Data Usage in Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 19
  7. 2024Double-I Watermark: Protecting Model Copyright for LLM Fine-tuningcited by 18
  8. 2024A General Framework for Data-Use Auditing of ML Modelscited by 15
  9. 2024SoK: Dataset Copyright Auditing in Machine Learning Systemscited by 14
  10. 2024Data Taggants: Dataset Ownership Verification via Harmless Targeted Data Poisoningcited by 8
  11. 2025DATABench: Evaluating Dataset Auditing in Deep Learning from an Adversarial Perspectivecited by 8
  12. 2024Inevitable Trade-off between Watermark Strength and Speculative Sampling Efficiency for Language Modelscited by 7
25 more
  1. 2025Mitigating Unintended Memorization with LoRA in Federated Learning for LLMscited by 6
  2. 2025Winter Soldier: Backdooring Language Models at Pre-Training with Indirect Data Poisoningcited by 6
  3. 2024On Evaluating The Performance of Watermarked Machine-Generated Texts Under Adversarial Attackscited by 4
  4. 2025Instance-Level Data-Use Auditing of Visual ML Modelscited by 4
  5. 2023Hey That's Mine Imperceptible Watermarks are Preserved in Diffusion Generated Outputscited by 3
  6. 2024CredID: Credible Multi-Bit Watermark for Large Language Models Identificationcited by 3
  7. 2025CBW: Towards Dataset Ownership Verification for Speaker Verification via Clustering-based Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 3
  8. 2025Data Provenance Auditing of Fine-Tuned Large Language Models with a Text-Preserving Techniquecited by 3
  9. 2026Watermarking LLM Agent Trajectoriescited by 3
  10. 2025Towards Dataset Copyright Evasion Attack against Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 2
  11. 2025Dataset Ownership Verification for Pre-trained Masked Modelscited by 2
  12. 2025Evading Data Provenance in Deep Neural Networkscited by 2
  13. 2025DSSmoothing: Toward Certified Dataset Ownership Verification for Pre-trained Language Models via Dual-Space Smoothingcited by 2
  14. 2025SSCL-BW: Sample-Specific Clean-Label Backdoor Watermarking for Dataset Ownership Verificationcited by 2
  15. 2025PATFinger: Prompt-Adapted Transferable Fingerprinting against Unauthorized Multimodal Dataset Usagecited by 1
  16. 2025LexiMark: Robust Watermarking via Lexical Substitutions to Enhance Membership Verification of an LLM's Textual Training Datacited by 1
  17. 2025Zero-Shot Attribution for Large Language Models: A Distribution Testing Approachcited by 1
  18. 2026X-Mark: Saliency-Guided Robust Dataset Ownership Verification for Medical Imagingcited by 1
  19. 2025CertDW: Towards Certified Dataset Ownership Verification via Conformal Calibrationcited by 0
  20. 2025HoneyImage: Verifiable, Harmless, and Stealthy Dataset Ownership Verification for Image Modelscited by 0
  21. 2025VICTOR: Dataset Copyright Auditing in Video Recognition Systemscited by 0
  22. 2026Repurposing and Evaluating the (In)Feasibility of Dataset Poisoning enabled Watermarking for Contrastive Learningcited by 0
  23. 2026Dataset Usage Inference without Shadow Models or Held-out Datacited by 0
  24. 2026Auditing Data Provenance in LLM Fine-tuning via Intrinsic Distributional Fingerprintscited by 0
  25. 2026Trustworthy synthetic visual media: Evidence across the media lifecyclecited by 0