mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Confidence-Building Measures for Artificial Intelligence: Workshop Proceedings

arXiv 2308.00862 ↗First posted 1 Aug 2023cs.CYcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Foundation models could eventually introduce several pathways for undermining state security: accidents, inadvertent escalation, unintentional conflict, the proliferation of weapons, and the interference with human diplomacy are just a few on a long list. The Confidence-Building Measures for Artificial Intelligence workshop hosted by the Geopolitics Team at OpenAI and the Berkeley Risk and Security Lab at the University of California brought together a multistakeholder group to think through the tools and strategies to mitigate the potential risks introduced by foundation models to international security. Originating in the Cold War, confidence-building measures (CBMs) are actions that reduce hostility, prevent conflict escalation, and improve trust between parties. The flexibility of CBMs make them a key instrument for navigating the rapid changes in the foundation model landscape. Participants identified the following CBMs that directly apply to foundation models and which are further explained in this conference proceedings: 1. crisis hotlines 2. incident sharing 3. model, transparency, and system cards 4. content provenance and watermarks 5. collaborative red teaming and table-top exercises and 6. dataset and evaluation sharing. Because most foundation model developers are non-government entities, many CBMs will need to involve a wider stakeholder community. These measures can be implemented either by AI labs or by relevant government actors.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Benchmark Early and Red Team Often: A Framework for Assessing and Managing Dual-Use Hazards of AI Foundation Models
  2. 2025Verifying International Agreements on AI: Six Layers of Verification for Rules on Large-Scale AI Development and Deployment
  3. 2026AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda
  4. 2024On Verbalized Confidence Scores for LLMs
  5. 2025A Different Approach to AI Safety: Proceedings from the Columbia Convening on Openness in Artificial Intelligence and AI Safety
  6. 2026Tipping Points in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems: Stance on Climate Change Action
  7. 2025Victor Calibration (VC): Multi-Pass Confidence Calibration and CP4.3 Governance Stress Test under Round-Table Orchestration
  8. 2025Safety by Measurement: A Systematic Literature Review of AI Safety Evaluation Methods