mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding Human Activity with Uncertainty Measure for Novelty in Graph Convolutional Networks

arXiv 2410.07917 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2024cs.RO cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding human activity is a crucial aspect of developing intelligent robots, particularly in the domain of human-robot collaboration. Nevertheless, existing systems encounter challenges such as over-segmentation, attributed to errors in the up-sampling process of the decoder. In response, we introduce a promising solution: the Temporal Fusion Graph Convolutional Network. This innovative approach aims to rectify the inadequate boundary estimation of individual actions within an activity stream and mitigate the issue of over-segmentation in the temporal dimension. Moreover, systems leveraging human activity recognition frameworks for decision-making necessitate more than just the identification of actions. They require a confidence value indicative of the certainty regarding the correspondence between observations and training examples. This is crucial to prevent overly confident responses to unforeseen scenarios that were not part of the training data and may have resulted in mismatches due to weak similarity measures within the system. To address this, we propose the incorporation of a Spectral Normalized Residual connection aimed at enhancing efficient estimation of novelty in observations. This innovative approach ensures the preservation of input distance within the feature space by imposing constraints on the maximum gradients of weight updates. By limiting these gradients, we promote a more robust handling of novel situations, thereby mitigating the risks associated with overconfidence. Our methodology involves the use of a Gaussian process to quantify the distance in feature space.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.

Builds on

25 of 37 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  4. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
  5. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
  6. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,636
  7. 2018Spatial Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-Based Action Recognitioncited by 1,209
  8. 2015Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networkscited by 796
  9. 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 446
  10. 2020Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance Awarenesscited by 389
  11. 2016Convolutional Two-Stream Network Fusion for Video Action Recognitioncited by 384
  12. 2018Invertible Residual Networkscited by 365
13 more
  1. 2021Channel-wise Topology Refinement Graph Convolution for Skeleton-Based Action Recognitioncited by 322
  2. 2015Deep Convolutional Networks on Graph-Structured Datacited by 246
  3. 2015Bayesian SegNet: Model Uncertainty in Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architectures for Scene Understandingcited by 218
  4. 2018Co-occurrence Feature Learning from Skeleton Data for Action Recognition and Detection with Hierarchical Aggregationcited by 106
  5. 2020The IKEA ASM Dataset: Understanding People Assembling Furniture through Actions, Objects and Posecited by 95
  6. 2018Reachability Analysis of Deep Neural Networks with Provable Guaranteescited by 93
  7. 2018Deep Cosine Metric Learning for Person Re-Identificationcited by 73
  8. 2019FastFCN: Rethinking Dilated Convolution in the Backbone for Semantic Segmentationcited by 70
  9. 2019Learning Object-Action Relations from Bimanual Human Demonstration Using Graph Networkscited by 29
  10. 2022Geometric Features Informed Multi-person Human-object Interaction Recognition in Videoscited by 17
  11. 2021Learning Asynchronous and Sparse Human-Object Interaction in Videoscited by 16
  12. 2021Motion Guided Attention Fusion to Recognize Interactions from Videoscited by 10
  13. 2023Persistent-Transient Duality: A Multi-mechanism Approach for Modeling Human-Object Interactioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.