mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quantifying Feature Space Universality Across Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv 2410.06981 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Universality Hypothesis in large language models (LLMs) claims that different models converge towards similar concept representations in their latent spaces. Providing evidence for this hypothesis would enable researchers to exploit universal properties, facilitating the generalization of mechanistic interpretability techniques across models. Previous works studied if LLMs learned the same features, which are internal representations that activate on specific concepts. Since comparing features across LLMs is challenging due to polysemanticity, in which LLM neurons often correspond to multiple unrelated features rather than to distinct concepts, sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have been employed to disentangle LLM neurons into SAE features corresponding to distinct concepts. In this paper, we introduce a new variation of the universality hypothesis called Analogous Feature Universality: we hypothesize that even if SAEs across different models learn different feature representations, the spaces spanned by SAE features are similar, such that one SAE space is similar to another SAE space under rotation-invariant transformations. Evidence for this hypothesis would imply that interpretability techniques related to latent spaces, such as steering vectors, may be transferred across models via certain transformations. To investigate this hypothesis, we first pair SAE features across different models via activation correlation, and then measure spatial relation similarities between paired features via representational similarity measures, which transform spaces into representations that reveal hidden relational similarities. Our experiments demonstrate high similarities for SAE feature spaces across various LLMs, providing evidence for feature space universality.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2024.

Builds on

35 of 72 references.

References · 35

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  3. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
  4. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  5. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  6. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
  7. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
  8. 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
  9. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
  10. 2023A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Modelscited by 639
  11. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
  12. 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 415
23 more
  1. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 381
  2. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 283
  3. 2022The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspectivecited by 246
  4. 2023An Overview of Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 214
  5. 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
  6. 2021Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural Representationscited by 203
  7. 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 201
  8. 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 171
  9. 2024Sycophancy to Subterfuge: Investigating Reward-Tampering in Large Language Modelscited by 158
  10. 2024The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 151
  11. 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 148
  12. 2023Getting aligned on representational alignmentcited by 142
  13. 2023A Toy Model of Universality: Reverse Engineering How Networks Learn Group Operationscited by 141
  14. 2022Linearly Mapping from Image to Text Spacecited by 139
  15. 2023Similarity of Neural Network Models: A Survey of Functional and Representational Measurescited by 128
  16. 2022Goal Misgeneralization: Why Correct Specifications Aren't Enough For Correct Goalscited by 120
  17. 2024Universal Neurons in GPT2 Language Modelscited by 100
  18. 2018Towards Understanding Learning Representations: To What Extent Do Different Neural Networks Learn the Same Representationcited by 62
  19. 2023Neuron to Graph: Interpreting Language Model Neurons at Scalecited by 26
  20. 2023Understanding and Controlling a Maze-Solving Policy Networkcited by 19
  21. 2024ReSi: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Representational Similarity Measurescited by 18
  22. 2024Interpreting Context Look-ups in Transformers: Investigating Attention-MLP Interactionscited by 11
  23. 2023DeepDecipher: Accessing and Investigating Neuron Activation in Large Language Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 9; 2026: 15.

25 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoderscited by 199
  2. 2024Llama Scope: Extracting Millions of Features from Llama-3.1-8B with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 133
  3. 2025We're Different, We're the Same: Creative Homogeneity Across LLMscited by 41
  4. 2025From superposition to sparse codes: interpretable representations in neural networkscited by 16
  5. 2025Representation Potentials of Foundation Models for Multimodal Alignment: A Surveycited by 10
  6. 2025Jacobian Sparse Autoencoders: Sparsify Computations, Not Just Activationscited by 9
  7. 2025Has the Creativity of Large-Language Models peaked? An analysis of inter- and intra-LLM variabilitycited by 6
  8. 2025Inference-Time Decomposition of Activations (ITDA): A Scalable Approach to Interpreting Large Language Modelscited by 3
  9. 2025Toward Preference-aligned Large Language Models via Residual-based Model Steeringcited by 3
  10. 2026Step-Level Sparse Autoencoder for Reasoning Process Interpretationcited by 3
  11. 2025Large Language Models Show Signs of Alignment with Human Neurocognition During Abstract Reasoningcited by 2
  12. 2026When Behavioral Safety Evaluation Fails: A Representation-Level Perspectivecited by 2
13 more
  1. 2026Cross-Architecture Steering Transfer in Language Models: A Systematic Empirical Studycited by 2
  2. 2026WriteSAE: Sparse Autoencoders for Recurrent Statecited by 1
  3. 2026Are Single-Token Sparse Autoencoder Features Causally Necessary? Layer-Depth and SAE-Family Effectscited by 1
  4. 2026Vector Quantized Latent Concepts: A Scalable Alternative to Clustering-Based Concept Discoverycited by 0
  5. 2026Exemplar Partitioning for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 0
  6. 2026Structure Retention in Embedding Spaces as a Predictor of Benchmark Performancecited by 0
  7. 2026At the Edge of Understanding: Sparse Autoencoders Trace The Limits of Transformer Generalizationcited by 0
  8. 2026Persistent Sparse Autoencoders: Learning Feature-Specific Timescales in Language Model Representationscited by 0
  9. 2026What, Where, and How: Disentangling the Roles of Task, Language, and Model in Code Model Representationscited by 0
  10. 2026Mapping and Measuring the Behavioral Evolution of Large Language Modelscited by 0
  11. 2026SAEVerbalizer: Generating Explanations for Sparse Autoencoder Features via Representation Verbalizationcited by 0
  12. 2026SharedSAE: One Feature Dictionary Across Language Modelscited by 0
  13. 2026Sampling Reveals Style: Unsupervised, Training-Free Discovery of Prompt-Conditional Stylistic Axes in LLM Activationscited by 0