Step-Level Sparse Autoencoder for Reasoning Process Interpretation
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved strong complex reasoning capabilities through Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. However, their reasoning patterns remain too complicated to analyze. While Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a powerful tool for interpretability, existing approaches predominantly operate at the token level, creating a granularity mismatch when capturing more critical step-level information, such as reasoning direction and semantic transitions. In this work, we propose step-level sparse autoencoder (SSAE), which serves as an analytical tool to disentangle different aspects of LLMs' reasoning steps into sparse features. Specifically, by precisely controlling the sparsity of a step feature conditioned on its context, we form an information bottleneck in step reconstruction, which splits incremental information from background information and disentangles it into several sparsely activated dimensions. Experiments on multiple base models and reasoning tasks show the effectiveness of the extracted features. By linear probing, we can easily predict surface-level information, such as generation length and first token distribution, as well as more complicated properties, such as the correctness and logicality of the step. These observations indicate that LLMs should already at least partly know about these properties during generation, which provides the foundation for the self-verification ability of LLMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/Miaow-Lab/SSAE.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.
Builds on
12 of 35 references.
References · 12
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 283
- 2023Implicit Chain of Thought Reasoning via Knowledge Distillationcited by 165
- 2024A Primer on the Inner Workings of Transformer-based Language Modelscited by 83
- 2025OpenCodeInstruct: A Large-scale Instruction Tuning Dataset for Code LLMscited by 57
- 2023Neuron to Graph: Interpreting Language Model Neurons at Scalecited by 26
- 2024Quantifying Feature Space Universality Across Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 25
- 2025Deep Thinking by Markov Chain of Continuous Thoughtscited by 8
- 2026UniCog: Uncovering Cognitive Abilities of LLMs through Latent Mind Space Analysiscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders
- 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Identify Reasoning Features in Language Models?
- 2025A Comparative Analysis of Sparse Autoencoder and Activation Difference in Language Model Steering
- 2025Feature Extraction and Steering for Enhanced Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models
- 2025Towards Interpretable and Inference-Optimal COT Reasoning with Sparse Autoencoder-Guided Generation
- 2025Exploring Task Performance with Interpretable Models via Sparse Auto-Encoders
- 2026Qwen-Scope: Turning Sparse Features into Development Tools for Large Language Models
- 2025ActivationReasoning: Logical Reasoning in Latent Activation Spaces