LiLAW: Lightweight Learnable Adaptive Weighting to Learn Sample Difficulty & Improve Noisy Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training deep neural networks with noise and data heterogeneity is a major challenge. We introduce Lightweight Learnable Adaptive Weighting (LiLAW), a method that dynamically adjusts the loss weight of each training sample based on its evolving difficulty, categorized as easy, moderate, and hard, using only three global learnable scalar parameters. LiLAW learns to adaptively prioritize samples by updating these parameters with a single gradient descent step on a validation mini-batch after each training mini-batch, without requiring a clean, unbiased validation set. Experiments across general and medical imaging datasets, several noise types and levels, loss functions, and architectures with and without pretraining, including linear probing and full fine-tuning, show that LiLAW consistently improves accuracy and AUROC, especially in higher-noise settings, without requiring excessive tuning. We also obtain state-of-the-art results incorporating synthetic and augmented data from SynPAIN, GAITGen, ECG5000, and improved fairness on the Adult dataset. LiLAW is lightweight, practical, and computationally efficient, making it an effective, scalable approach to boost generalization and robustness across diverse deep learning training setups, especially in resource-constrained settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 74 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.
Builds on
74 of 87 references.
References · 74
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,988
38 more
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 1,000
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 675
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
- 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 425
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2023Text-to-image Diffusion Models in Generative AI: A Surveycited by 265
- 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 261
- 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
- 2022Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and Not Yet Learntcited by 236
- 2020MedMNIST Classification Decathlon: A Lightweight AutoML Benchmark for Medical Image Analysiscited by 206
- 2021Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficultycited by 141
- 2020Estimating Example Difficulty Using Variance of Gradientscited by 97
- 2020Characterizing Structural Regularities of Labeled Data in Overparameterized Modelscited by 93
- 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
- 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
- 2022UNICON: Combating Label Noise Through Uniform Selection and Contrastive Learningcited by 77
- 2020A Topological Filter for Learning with Label Noisecited by 76
- 2020Error-Bounded Correction of Noisy Labelscited by 74
- 2024Comprehensive Exploration of Synthetic Data Generation: A Surveycited by 60
- 2021Probabilistic Margins for Instance Reweighting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 57
- 2020Fairness Metrics: A Comparative Analysiscited by 45
- 2021Understanding the role of importance weighting for deep learningcited by 39
- 2022Characterizing Datapoints via Second-Split Forgettingcited by 37
- 2021Towards Understanding Deep Learning from Noisy Labels with Small-Loss Criterioncited by 36
- 2022Metadata Archaeology: Unearthing Data Subsets by Leveraging Training Dynamicscited by 26
- 2022Data-IQ: Characterizing subgroups with heterogeneous outcomes in tabular datacited by 22
- 2020Robustness of Accuracy Metric and its Inspirations in Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 20
- 2023PECoP: Parameter Efficient Continual Pretraining for Action Quality Assessmentcited by 19
50 most cited of 74 All 74 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.