Grounding Language in Multi-Perspective Referential Communication
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce a task and dataset for referring expression generation and comprehension in multi-agent embodied environments. In this task, two agents in a shared scene must take into account one another's visual perspective, which may be different from their own, to both produce and understand references to objects in a scene and the spatial relations between them. We collect a dataset of 2,970 human-written referring expressions, each paired with human comprehension judgments, and evaluate the performance of automated models as speakers and listeners paired with human partners, finding that model performance in both reference generation and comprehension lags behind that of pairs of human agents. Finally, we experiment training an open-weight speaker model with evidence of communicative success when paired with a listener, resulting in an improvement from 58.9 to 69.3% in communicative success and even outperforming the strongest proprietary model.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2024.
Builds on
17 of 34 references.
References · 17
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
- 2019Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Researchcited by 1,191
- 2023ScanNet++: A High-Fidelity Dataset of 3D Indoor Scenescited by 764
- 2023ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoningcited by 603
- 2022Visual Programming: Compositional visual reasoning without trainingcited by 516
- 2023Ferret: Refer and Ground Anything Anywhere at Any Granularitycited by 509
- 2023High-fidelity 3D Human Digitization from Single 2K Resolution Imagescited by 70
- 2023Modular Visual Question Answering via Code Generationcited by 48
- 2019The PhotoBook Dataset: Building Common Ground through Visually-Grounded Dialoguecited by 46
5 more
- 2019A Natural Language Corpus of Common Grounding under Continuous and Partially-Observable Contextcited by 35
- 2022Continual Learning for Instruction Following from Realtime Feedbackcited by 22
- 2021Continual Learning for Grounded Instruction Generation by Observing Human Following Behaviorcited by 19
- 2023Computational Language Acquisition with Theory of Mindcited by 15
- 2020A Linguistic Analysis of Visually Grounded Dialogues Based on Spatial Expressionscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 8.
12 papers.
- 2025Vision-Language Models Are Not Pragmatically Competent in Referring Expression Generationcited by 8
- 2026LVLMs and Humans Ground Differently in Referential Communicationcited by 8
- 2025Characterizing Language Use in a Collaborative Situated Gamecited by 3
- 2026When More Words Say Less: Decoupling Length and Specificity in Image Description Evaluationcited by 2
- 2026Representational Similarity and Model Behavior in Multi-Agent Interactioncited by 2
- 2026Sycophancy Undermines Epistemic Vigilance in Cooperative Vision-Language Taskscited by 2
- 2025Coreference as an indicator of context scope in multimodal narrativecited by 0
- 2025Planning Ahead with RSA: Efficient Signalling in Dynamic Environments by Projecting User Awareness across Future Timestepscited by 0
- 2026A Taxonomy of Conceptual Alignment in Human-Robot Dialoguecited by 0
- 2026Unified Agent: Managing Interactions across Devicescited by 0
- 2026When Seeing Is Not Enough: Benchmarking Interactive Visual Grounding in LVLMscited by 0
- 2026Learning to Refer from Estimated Listener Gazecited by 0
- 2026Learning to Refer from Estimated Listener Gaze13 Sep 2026
- 2026When Seeing Is Not Enough: Benchmarking Interactive Visual Grounding in LVLMs25 Aug 2026
- 2026Unified Agent: Managing Interactions across Devices6 Aug 2026
- 2026Sycophancy Undermines Epistemic Vigilance in Cooperative Vision-Language Tasks31 Jul 2026
- 2026A Taxonomy of Conceptual Alignment in Human-Robot Dialogue21 Jun 2026
- 2026Representational Similarity and Model Behavior in Multi-Agent Interaction5 Jun 2026
- 2026LVLMs and Humans Ground Differently in Referential Communication27 Jan 2026
- 2026When More Words Say Less: Decoupling Length and Specificity in Image Description Evaluation8 Jan 2026
- 2025Characterizing Language Use in a Collaborative Situated Game3 Dec 2025
- 2025Planning Ahead with RSA: Efficient Signalling in Dynamic Environments by Projecting User Awareness across Future Timesteps27 Oct 2025
- 2025Vision-Language Models Are Not Pragmatically Competent in Referring Expression Generation22 Apr 2025
- 2025Coreference as an indicator of context scope in multimodal narrative7 Mar 2025