mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Taxonomy of Conceptual Alignment in Human-Robot Dialogue

arXiv 2606.22360 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2026cs.RO cs.CL cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Successful conversations require speakers to align on the meaning of concepts, a challenging but crucial task for human-robot interaction. Understanding the process of establishing such alignment is hindered by competing interpretations of the term and isolated, unidirectional investigations of its design space. This paper argues for a design-centric understanding of conceptual alignment as a bidirectional and co-constructive process. We introduce a taxonomy that characterizes conceptual alignment dialogues along what triggers its initiation and what level(s) of conceptual understanding it concerns. We further present a dialogue act schema as an operational tool that captures the interactional moves through which alignment is achieved. Together, these contributions provide a structured foundation for analyzing, comparing, and designing conceptual alignment in human-robot interaction.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2026.

Builds on

8 of 43 references.

References · 8

  1. 2024Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignmentcited by 18
  2. 2021Learning Perceptual Concepts by Bootstrapping from Human Queriescited by 12
  3. 2024Grounding Language in Multi-Perspective Referential Communicationcited by 12
  4. 2023Aligning Robot and Human Representationscited by 11
  5. 2024Concept Alignmentcited by 10
  6. 2021Patterns for Representing Knowledge Graphs to Communicate Situational Knowledge of Service Robotscited by 7
  7. 2023Communicative Robot Signals: Presenting a New Typology for Human-Robot Interactioncited by 4
  8. 2023Interactive Acquisition of Fine-grained Visual Concepts by Exploiting Semantics of Generic Characterizations in Discoursecited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.