ActPlan-1K: Benchmarking the Procedural Planning Ability of Visual Language Models in Household Activities
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models~(LLMs) have been adopted to process textual task description and accomplish procedural planning in embodied AI tasks because of their powerful reasoning ability. However, there is still lack of study on how vision language models~(VLMs) behave when multi-modal task inputs are considered. Counterfactual planning that evaluates the model's reasoning ability over alternative task situations are also under exploited. In order to evaluate the planning ability of both multi-modal and counterfactual aspects, we propose ActPlan-1K. ActPlan-1K is a multi-modal planning benchmark constructed based on ChatGPT and household activity simulator iGibson2. The benchmark consists of 153 activities and 1,187 instances. Each instance describing one activity has a natural language task description and multiple environment images from the simulator. The gold plan of each instance is action sequences over the objects in provided scenes. Both the correctness and commonsense satisfaction are evaluated on typical VLMs. It turns out that current VLMs are still struggling at generating human-level procedural plans for both normal activities and counterfactual activities. We further provide automatic evaluation metrics by finetuning over BLEURT model to facilitate future research on our benchmark.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 22 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2024.
Builds on
22 of 30 references.
References · 22
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,071
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,439
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
- 2019Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Researchcited by 1,191
- 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,035
- 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 869
- 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 783
- 2023VILA: On Pre-training for Visual Language Modelscited by 692
- 2018Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agentscited by 481
- 2022LM-Nav: Robotic Navigation with Large Pre-Trained Models of Language, Vision, and Actioncited by 439
10 more
- 2018VirtualHome: Simulating Household Activities via Programscited by 415
- 2022Visual Language Maps for Robot Navigationcited by 365
- 2023Text2Motion: From Natural Language Instructions to Feasible Planscited by 224
- 2022Pre-Trained Language Models for Interactive Decision-Makingcited by 221
- 2021iGibson 2.0: Object-Centric Simulation for Robot Learning of Everyday Household Taskscited by 194
- 2021BEHAVIOR: Benchmark for Everyday Household Activities in Virtual, Interactive, and Ecological Environmentscited by 165
- 2020iGibson 1.0: a Simulation Environment for Interactive Tasks in Large Realistic Scenescited by 155
- 2020Watch-And-Help: A Challenge for Social Perception and Human-AI Collaborationcited by 133
- 2024AutoRT: Embodied Foundation Models for Large Scale Orchestration of Robotic Agentscited by 87
- 2023VLN-Trans: Translator for the Vision and Language Navigation Agentcited by 25
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 3.
9 papers.
- 2025LEGO-Puzzles: How Good Are MLLMs at Multi-Step Spatial Reasoning?cited by 49
- 2025Large Language Models for Planning: A Comprehensive and Systematic Surveycited by 40
- 2025iVISPAR -- An Interactive Visual-Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for VLMscited by 25
- 2025PLANET: A Collection of Benchmarks for Evaluating LLMs' Planning Capabilitiescited by 7
- 2025LLaPa: A Vision-Language Model Framework for Counterfactual-Aware Procedural Planningcited by 6
- 2025Ego-EXTRA: video-language Egocentric Dataset for EXpert-TRAinee assistancecited by 4
- 2026LLM-WikiRace Benchmark: How Far Can LLMs Plan over Real-World Knowledge Graphs?cited by 1
- 2026GaLa: Hypergraph-Guided Visual Language Models for Procedural Planningcited by 0
- 2026STAGE: Diagnosing Semantic Transfer at Grounded Execution in Embodied Agentscited by 0
- 2026STAGE: Diagnosing Semantic Transfer at Grounded Execution in Embodied Agents11 Sep 2026
- 2026GaLa: Hypergraph-Guided Visual Language Models for Procedural Planning19 Apr 2026
- 2026LLM-WikiRace Benchmark: How Far Can LLMs Plan over Real-World Knowledge Graphs?18 Feb 2026
- 2025Ego-EXTRA: video-language Egocentric Dataset for EXpert-TRAinee assistance15 Dec 2025
- 2025LLaPa: A Vision-Language Model Framework for Counterfactual-Aware Procedural Planning11 Jul 2025
- 2025Large Language Models for Planning: A Comprehensive and Systematic Survey26 May 2025
- 2025PLANET: A Collection of Benchmarks for Evaluating LLMs' Planning Capabilities21 Apr 2025
- 2025LEGO-Puzzles: How Good Are MLLMs at Multi-Step Spatial Reasoning?25 Mar 2025
- 2025iVISPAR -- An Interactive Visual-Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for VLMs5 Feb 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024LoTa-Bench: Benchmarking Language-oriented Task Planners for Embodied Agents
- 2026Plan-Bench: Can Existing VLMs Go Well Beyond Perception to Reason and Plan in Embodied Worlds?
- 2025ViPlan: A Benchmark for Visual Planning with Symbolic Predicates and Vision-Language Models
- 2024Multi-Agent Planning Using Visual Language Models
- 2024EgoPlan-Bench2: A Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Model Planning in Real-World Scenarios
- 2026Multimodal Behavior Tree Generation: A Small Vision-Language Model for Robot Task Planning
- 2025EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied Agents
- 2023EgoPlan-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Human-Level Planning