Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models for News Recommendation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite large language models (LLMs) increasingly becoming important components of news recommender systems, employing LLMs in such systems introduces new risks, such as the influence of cognitive biases in LLMs. Cognitive biases refer to systematic patterns of deviation from norms or rationality in the judgment process, which can result in inaccurate outputs from LLMs, thus threatening the reliability of news recommender systems. Specifically, LLM-based news recommender systems affected by cognitive biases could lead to the propagation of misinformation, reinforcement of stereotypes, and the formation of echo chambers. In this paper, we explore the potential impact of multiple cognitive biases on LLM-based news recommender systems, including anchoring bias, framing bias, status quo bias and group attribution bias. Furthermore, to facilitate future research at improving the reliability of LLM-based news recommender systems, we discuss strategies to mitigate these biases through data augmentation, prompt engineering and learning algorithms aspects.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2024.
Builds on
24 of 38 references.
References · 24
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,122
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendationcited by 378
- 2021Large Pre-trained Language Models Contain Human-like Biases of What is Right and Wrong to Docited by 178
- 2023Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey designcited by 176
- 2023Is ChatGPT Fair for Recommendation? Evaluating Fairness in Large Language Model Recommendationcited by 113
- 2022Capturing Failures of Large Language Models via Human Cognitive Biasescited by 97
12 more
- 2023ONCE: Boosting Content-based Recommendation with Both Open- and Closed-source Large Language Modelscited by 54
- 2023Instructed to Bias: Instruction-Tuned Language Models Exhibit Emergent Cognitive Biascited by 51
- 2024Addressing cognitive bias in medical language modelscited by 34
- 2024Understanding Biases in ChatGPT-based Recommender Systems: Provider Fairness, Temporal Stability, and Recencycited by 27
- 2023Prompt Learning for News Recommendationcited by 25
- 2024Item-side Fairness of Large Language Model-based Recommendation Systemcited by 21
- 2023A Preliminary Study of ChatGPT on News Recommendation: Personalization, Provider Fairness, Fake Newscited by 19
- 2024KnowTuning: Knowledge-aware Fine-tuning for Large Language Modelscited by 11
- 2024Exploring the Impact of Large Language Models on Recommender Systems: An Extensive Reviewcited by 11
- 2022Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understandingcited by 10
- 2024Towards Empathetic Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 9
- 2020Public discourse and social network echo chambers driven by socio-cognitive biasescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025DeepShop: A Benchmark for Deep Research Shopping Agentscited by 42
- 2026EvoScientist: Towards Multi-Agent Evolving AI Scientists for End-to-End Scientific Discoverycited by 41
- 2024MACPO: Weak-to-Strong Alignment via Multi-Agent Contrastive Preference Optimizationcited by 20
- 2025Bias Beware: The Impact of Cognitive Biases on LLM-Driven Product Recommendationscited by 10
- 2025Self-Adaptive Cognitive Debiasing for Large Language Models in Decision-Makingcited by 4
- 2026EvoIdeator: Evolving Scientific Ideas through Checklist-Grounded Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
- 2026EvoIdeator: Evolving Scientific Ideas through Checklist-Grounded Reinforcement Learning23 Mar 2026
- 2026EvoScientist: Towards Multi-Agent Evolving AI Scientists for End-to-End Scientific Discovery9 Mar 2026
- 2025DeepShop: A Benchmark for Deep Research Shopping Agents3 Jun 2025
- 2025Self-Adaptive Cognitive Debiasing for Large Language Models in Decision-Making5 Apr 2025
- 2025Bias Beware: The Impact of Cognitive Biases on LLM-Driven Product Recommendations3 Feb 2025
- 2024MACPO: Weak-to-Strong Alignment via Multi-Agent Contrastive Preference Optimization10 Oct 2024