mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Empathetic Conversational Recommender Systems

arXiv 2409.10527 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2024cs.IR cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conversational recommender systems (CRSs) are able to elicit user preferences through multi-turn dialogues. They typically incorporate external knowledge and pre-trained language models to capture the dialogue context. Most CRS approaches, trained on benchmark datasets, assume that the standard items and responses in these benchmarks are optimal. However, they overlook that users may express negative emotions with the standard items and may not feel emotionally engaged by the standard responses. This issue leads to a tendency to replicate the logic of recommenders in the dataset instead of aligning with user needs. To remedy this misalignment, we introduce empathy within a CRS. With empathy we refer to a system's ability to capture and express emotions. We propose an empathetic conversational recommender (ECR) framework. ECR contains two main modules: emotion-aware item recommendation and emotion-aligned response generation. Specifically, we employ user emotions to refine user preference modeling for accurate recommendations. To generate human-like emotional responses, ECR applies retrieval-augmented prompts to fine-tune a pre-trained language model aligning with emotions and mitigating hallucination. To address the challenge of insufficient supervision labels, we enlarge our empathetic data using emotion labels annotated by large language models and emotional reviews collected from external resources. We propose novel evaluation metrics to capture user satisfaction in real-world CRS scenarios. Our experiments on the ReDial dataset validate the efficacy of our framework in enhancing recommendation accuracy and improving user satisfaction.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2024.

Builds on

31 of 56 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
  4. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
  5. 2019DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generationcited by 842
  6. 2023Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speechcited by 165
  7. 2023Uncovering ChatGPT's Capabilities in Recommender Systemscited by 160
  8. 2023Large Language Models as Zero-Shot Conversational Recommenderscited by 126
  9. 2020Improving Conversational Recommender Systems via Knowledge Graph based Semantic Fusioncited by 122
  10. 2021Advances and Challenges in Conversational Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 118
  11. 2019Towards Knowledge-Based Recommender Dialog Systemcited by 112
  12. 2020Estimation-Action-Reflection: Towards Deep Interaction Between Conversational and Recommender Systemscited by 98
19 more
  1. 2020Towards Topic-Guided Conversational Recommender Systemcited by 94
  2. 2022Towards Unified Conversational Recommender Systems via Knowledge-Enhanced Prompt Learningcited by 85
  3. 2020Interactive Path Reasoning on Graph for Conversational Recommendationcited by 72
  4. 2020A Taxonomy of Empathetic Response Intents in Human Social Conversationscited by 51
  5. 2021Unified Conversational Recommendation Policy Learning via Graph-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 51
  6. 2020Knowledge Bridging for Empathetic Dialogue Generationcited by 50
  7. 2023Rethinking the Evaluation for Conversational Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 48
  8. 2021RevCore: Review-augmented Conversational Recommendationcited by 47
  9. 2022A Unified Multi-task Learning Framework for Multi-goal Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 32
  10. 2020CR-Walker: Tree-Structured Graph Reasoning and Dialog Acts for Conversational Recommendationcited by 31
  11. 2022User-Centric Conversational Recommendation with Multi-Aspect User Modelingcited by 29
  12. 2021Improving Conversational Recommendation Systems' Quality with Context-Aware Item Meta Informationcited by 26
  13. 2022C2-CRS: Coarse-to-Fine Contrastive Learning for Conversational Recommender Systemcited by 24
  14. 2022Variational Reasoning over Incomplete Knowledge Graphs for Conversational Recommendationcited by 22
  15. 2020Leveraging Historical Interaction Data for Improving Conversational Recommender Systemcited by 15
  16. 2023TREA: Tree-Structure Reasoning Schema for Conversational Recommendationcited by 15
  17. 2024Exploiting Emotion-Semantic Correlations for Empathetic Response Generationcited by 5
  18. 2018Movie Recommendation System using Sentiment Analysis from Microblogging Datacited by 4
  19. 2023E-CORE: Emotion Correlation Enhanced Empathetic Dialogue Generationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 7.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024EmPO: Emotion Grounding for Empathetic Response Generation through Preference Optimization
  2. 2025From Measurement to Expertise: Empathetic Expert Adapters for Context-Based Empathy in Conversational AI Agents
  3. 2025Evaluating Conversational Recommender Systems via Large Language Models: A User-Centric Framework
  4. 2025From Generic Empathy to Personalized Emotional Support: A Self-Evolution Framework for User Preference Alignment
  5. 2026When and How to Ask: Dynamic Preference Elicitation Strategies for Conversational Recommendation ↗
  6. 2026ENPMR-Bench: Benchmarking Proactive Memory Retrieval for Emotional Support Agents
  7. 2024Behavior Alignment: A New Perspective of Evaluating LLM-based Conversational Recommender Systems
  8. 2025RecUserSim: A Realistic and Diverse User Simulator for Evaluating Conversational Recommender Systems