mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding

arXiv 2212.05421 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2022cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Natural language understanding (NLU) models often rely on dataset biases rather than intended task-relevant features to achieve high performance on specific datasets. As a result, these models perform poorly on datasets outside the training distribution. Some recent studies address this issue by reducing the weights of biased samples during the training process. However, these methods still encode biased latent features in representations and neglect the dynamic nature of bias, which hinders model prediction. We propose an NLU debiasing method, named debiasing contrastive learning (DCT), to simultaneously alleviate the above problems based on contrastive learning. We devise a debiasing, positive sampling strategy to mitigate biased latent features by selecting the least similar biased positive samples. We also propose a dynamic negative sampling strategy to capture the dynamic influence of biases by employing a bias-only model to dynamically select the most similar biased negative samples. We conduct experiments on three NLU benchmark datasets. Experimental results show that DCT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on out-of-distribution datasets while maintaining in-distribution performance. We also verify that DCT can reduce biased latent features from the model's representation.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2022.

Builds on

46 of 50 references.

References · 46

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  4. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  5. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  6. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  7. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,173
  8. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  9. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,847
  10. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,845
  11. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,375
  12. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
34 more
  1. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
  2. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 671
  3. 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 571
  4. 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 439
  5. 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 402
  6. 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 280
  7. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 276
  8. 2020DeCLUTR: Deep Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Textual Representationscited by 251
  9. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 232
  10. 2021Get Your Vitamin C! Robust Fact Verification with Contrastive Evidencecited by 225
  11. 2018Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inferencecited by 213
  12. 2019Towards Debiasing Fact Verification Modelscited by 143
  13. 2018Breaking NLI Systems with Sentences that Require Simple Lexical Inferencescited by 134
  14. 2019End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corporacited by 128
  15. 2016Analyzing the Behavior of Visual Question Answering Modelscited by 119
  16. 2019Unlearn Dataset Bias in Natural Language Inference by Fitting the Residualcited by 119
  17. 2020Towards Debiasing NLU Models from Unknown Biasescited by 116
  18. 2018How Much Reading Does Reading Comprehension Require? A Critical Investigation of Popular Benchmarkscited by 88
  19. 2020Syntactic Data Augmentation Increases Robustness to Inference Heuristicscited by 86
  20. 2020Mind the Trade-off: Debiasing NLU Models without Degrading the In-distribution Performancecited by 85
  21. 2022Shortcut Learning of Large Language Models in Natural Language Understandingcited by 85
  22. 2020Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling themcited by 83
  23. 2021Towards Interpreting and Mitigating Shortcut Learning Behavior of NLU Modelscited by 78
  24. 2021Tailor: Generating and Perturbing Text with Semantic Controlscited by 68
  25. 2022Generating Data to Mitigate Spurious Correlations in Natural Language Inference Datasetscited by 54
  26. 2021CLINE: Contrastive Learning with Semantic Negative Examples for Natural Language Understandingcited by 50
  27. 2019Don't Take the Premise for Granted: Mitigating Artifacts in Natural Language Inferencecited by 49
  28. 2018Evaluating Compositionality in Sentence Embeddingscited by 35
  29. 2019On Adversarial Removal of Hypothesis-only Bias in Natural Language Inferencecited by 29
  30. 2021End-to-End Self-Debiasing Framework for Robust NLU Trainingcited by 24
  31. 2021Avoiding Inference Heuristics in Few-shot Prompt-based Finetuningcited by 23
  32. 2020On the importance of pre-training data volume for compact language modelscited by 21
  33. 2021Debiasing Methods in Natural Language Understanding Make Bias More Accessiblecited by 17
  34. 2021KNN-BERT: Fine-Tuning Pre-Trained Models with KNN Classifiercited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 3.

10 papers.