mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MACPO: Weak-to-Strong Alignment via Multi-Agent Contrastive Preference Optimization

arXiv 2410.07672 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 20

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Reinforcement learning for LLM agents

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models (LLMs) are rapidly advancing and achieving near-human capabilities on specific tasks, aligning them with human values is becoming more urgent. In scenarios where LLMs outperform humans, we face a weak-to-strong alignment problem where we need to effectively align strong student LLMs through weak supervision generated by weak teachers. Existing alignment methods mainly focus on strong-to-weak alignment and self-alignment settings, and it is impractical to adapt them to the much harder weak-to-strong alignment setting. To fill this gap, we propose a multi-agent contrastive preference optimization (MACPO) framework. MACPO facilitates weak teachers and strong students to learn from each other by iteratively reinforcing unfamiliar positive behaviors while penalizing familiar negative ones. To get this, we devise a mutual positive behavior augmentation strategy to encourage weak teachers and strong students to learn from each other's positive behavior and further provide higher quality positive behavior for the next iteration. Additionally, we propose a hard negative behavior construction strategy to induce weak teachers and strong students to generate familiar negative behavior by fine-tuning on negative behavioral data. Experimental results on the HH-RLHF and PKU-SafeRLHF datasets, evaluated using both automatic metrics and human judgments, demonstrate that MACPO simultaneously improves the alignment performance of strong students and weak teachers. Moreover, as the number of weak teachers increases, MACPO achieves better weak-to-strong alignment performance through more iteration optimization rounds.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for LLM agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 82 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.

Builds on

82 of 96 references.

References · 82

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  6. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  7. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  8. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  9. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  10. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  11. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  12. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
38 more
  1. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  2. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,442
  3. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
  4. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
  5. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
  6. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
  7. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 893
  8. 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challengescited by 752
  9. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 738
  10. 2023WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-Instructcited by 728
  11. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
  12. 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 630
  13. 2023WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instructcited by 618
  14. 2023AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviorscited by 580
  15. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
  16. 2019CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Datacited by 544
  17. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 486
  18. 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 486
  19. 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 445
  20. 2023Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generationcited by 439
  21. 2023Cognitive Architectures for Language Agentscited by 422
  22. 2023Scaling Data-Constrained Language Modelscited by 391
  23. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 390
  24. 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 357
  25. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraintcited by 346
  26. 2023Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agentscited by 329
  27. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
  28. 2023Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignmentcited by 283
  29. 2023A Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent Collaborationcited by 281
  30. 2024Iterative Reasoning Preference Optimizationcited by 244
  31. 2024Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positivecited by 239
  32. 2024Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learningcited by 238
  33. 2024Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignmentcited by 228
  34. 2024Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?cited by 227
  35. 2023Improving Language Model Negotiation with Self-Play and In-Context Learning from AI Feedbackcited by 202
  36. 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judgecited by 202
  37. 2024Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Datacited by 184
  38. 2024Direct Nash Optimization: Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve with General Preferencescited by 176

50 most cited of 82 All 82 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 12; 2026: 7.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025DeepShop: A Benchmark for Deep Research Shopping Agentscited by 42
  2. 2026EvoScientist: Towards Multi-Agent Evolving AI Scientists for End-to-End Scientific Discoverycited by 41
  3. 2025Heterogeneous Swarms: Jointly Optimizing Model Roles and Weights for Multi-LLM Systemscited by 22
  4. 2025Uni-X: Mitigating Modality Conflict with a Two-End-Separated Architecture for Unified Multimodal Modelscited by 18
  5. 2024The Road to Artificial SuperIntelligence: A Comprehensive Survey of Superalignmentcited by 11
  6. 2025Well Begun is Half Done: Low-resource Preference Alignment by Weak-to-Strong Decodingcited by 7
  7. 2025Co-Evolving Agents: Learning from Failures as Hard Negativescited by 7
  8. 2026EvoIdeator: Evolving Scientific Ideas through Checklist-Grounded Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
  9. 2025How to Mitigate Overfitting in Weak-to-strong Generalization?cited by 3
  10. 2025Weak-to-Strong Generalization via Bregman Bias-Variance Decompositioncited by 3
  11. 2025Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Failure Trajectories: A Tree-based Approach to Elicit Optimal Policy in Strong Modelscited by 3
  12. 2025Super Co-alignment of Human and AI for Sustainable Symbiotic Societycited by 2
8 more
  1. 2025Contrastive Weak-to-strong Generalizationcited by 2
  2. 2025Research Superalignment Should Advance Now with Alternating Competence and Conformity Optimizationcited by 1
  3. 2025Bridging the Capability Gap: Joint Alignment Tuning for Harmonizing LLM-based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 1
  4. 2026ATLAS: A Multi-LLM Training Framework for EvoDPO with Adaptive Reference Evolutioncited by 0
  5. 2026Evaluating Risks in Weak-to-Strong Alignment: A Bias-Variance Perspectivecited by 0
  6. 2026On the Blessing of Pre-training in Weak-to-Strong Generalizationcited by 0
  7. 2026When In-Distribution Gains Fail: Evaluating Weak-to-Strong Reward Models under Preference Shiftcited by 0
  8. 2026StepGuard: Guarding Web Navigation via Single-Step Calibrationcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Weak-to-Strong Preference Optimization: Stealing Reward from Weak Aligned Model
  2. 2026MINT: Min-Selection Preference Distillation for Balanced Multi-Objective Alignment
  3. 2024Extensive Self-Contrast Enables Feedback-Free Language Model Alignment
  4. 2025UC-MOA: Utility-Conditioned Multi-Objective Alignment for Distributional Pareto-Optimality
  5. 2025RE-PO: Robust Enhanced Policy Optimization as a General Framework for LLM Alignment
  6. 2025HPS: Hard Preference Sampling for Human Preference Alignment
  7. 2024Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment
  8. 2025Proximalized Preference Optimization for Diverse Feedback Types: A Decomposed Perspective on DPO