mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Revisiting Prefix-tuning: Statistical Benefits of Reparameterization among Prompts

arXiv 2410.02200 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2024cs.LGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prompt-based techniques, such as prompt-tuning and prefix-tuning, have gained prominence for their efficiency in fine-tuning large pre-trained models. Despite their widespread adoption, the theoretical foundations of these methods remain limited. For instance, in prefix-tuning, we observe that a key factor in achieving performance parity with full fine-tuning lies in the reparameterization strategy. However, the theoretical principles underpinning the effectiveness of this approach have yet to be thoroughly examined. Our study demonstrates that reparameterization is not merely an engineering trick but is grounded in deep theoretical foundations. Specifically, we show that the reparameterization strategy implicitly encodes a shared structure between prefix key and value vectors. Building on recent insights into the connection between prefix-tuning and mixture of experts models, we further illustrate that this shared structure significantly improves sample efficiency in parameter estimation compared to non-shared alternatives. The effectiveness of prefix-tuning across diverse tasks is empirically confirmed to be enhanced by the shared structure, through extensive experiments in both visual and language domains. Additionally, we uncover similar structural benefits in prompt-tuning, offering new perspectives on its success. Our findings provide theoretical and empirical contributions, advancing the understanding of prompt-based methods and their underlying mechanisms.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2024.

Builds on

46 of 73 references.

References · 46

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  6. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  7. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  8. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  9. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  10. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  11. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  12. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
34 more
  1. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
  2. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  3. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  4. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
  5. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
  6. 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,199
  7. 2021GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Expertscited by 890
  8. 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 863
  9. 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 791
  10. 2021Scaling Vision with Sparse Mixture of Expertscited by 740
  11. 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 690
  12. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
  13. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 641
  14. 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 420
  15. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 419
  16. 2022Scaling & Shifting Your Features: A New Baseline for Efficient Model Tuningcited by 292
  17. 2013Learning Factored Representations in a Deep Mixture of Expertscited by 275
  18. 2017The E2E Dataset: New Challenges For End-to-End Generationcited by 252
  19. 2023From Sparse to Soft Mixtures of Expertscited by 245
  20. 2023Scaling Down to Scale Up: A Guide to Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 171
  21. 2020Exploring Versatile Generative Language Model Via Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 139
  22. 2017Fine-Grained Car Detection for Visual Census Estimationcited by 76
  23. 2021How Well Do Sparse Imagenet Models Transfer?cited by 50
  24. 2024Mixture of Experts Meets Prompt-Based Continual Learningcited by 43
  25. 2023When Do Prompting and Prefix-Tuning Work? A Theory of Capabilities and Limitationscited by 41
  26. 2019Convergence Rates for Gaussian Mixtures of Expertscited by 39
  27. 2022Standing on the Shoulders of Giant Frozen Language Modelscited by 33
  28. 2023Demystifying Softmax Gating Function in Gaussian Mixture of Expertscited by 33
  29. 2023Brainformers: Trading Simplicity for Efficiencycited by 31
  30. 2024On Least Square Estimation in Softmax Gating Mixture of Expertscited by 23
  31. 2024Sigmoid Gating is More Sample Efficient than Softmax Gating in Mixture of Expertscited by 23
  32. 2022Refined Convergence Rates for Maximum Likelihood Estimation under Finite Mixture Modelscited by 22
  33. 2024Is Temperature Sample Efficient for Softmax Gaussian Mixture of Experts?cited by 15
  34. 2023Improving Prompt Tuning with Learned Prompting Layerscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 10; 2026: 4.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Prompting without Panic: Attribute-aware, Zero-shot, Test-Time Calibration
  2. 2026Why Prompt Optimization Works, and Why It Sometimes Doesn't: A Causal-Inspired Edit-Level Analysis
  3. 2023ArGue: Attribute-Guided Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2024Nemesis: Normalizing the Soft-prompt Vectors of Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025Doubly Debiased Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  6. 2025Flaw or Artifact? Rethinking Prompt Sensitivity in Evaluating LLMs
  7. 2026Improving Calibration in Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Data-Free Flatness-Aware Prompt Pretraining
  8. 2025DynaPrompt: Dynamic Test-Time Prompt Tuning