Doubly Debiased Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-time prompt tuning for vision-language models has demonstrated impressive generalization capabilities under zero-shot settings. However, tuning the learnable prompts solely based on unlabeled test data may induce prompt optimization bias, ultimately leading to suboptimal performance on downstream tasks. In this work, we analyze the underlying causes of prompt optimization bias from both the model and data perspectives. In terms of the model, the entropy minimization objective typically focuses on reducing the entropy of model predictions while overlooking their correctness. This can result in overconfident yet incorrect outputs, thereby compromising the quality of prompt optimization. On the data side, prompts affected by optimization bias can introduce misalignment between visual and textual modalities, which further aggravates the prompt optimization bias. To this end, we propose a Doubly Debiased Test-Time Prompt Tuning method. Specifically, we first introduce a dynamic retrieval-augmented modulation module that retrieves high-confidence knowledge from a dynamic knowledge base using the test image feature as a query, and uses the retrieved knowledge to modulate the predictions. Guided by the refined predictions, we further develop a reliability-aware prompt optimization module that incorporates a confidence-based weighted ensemble and cross-modal consistency distillation to impose regularization constraints during prompt tuning. Extensive experiments across 15 benchmark datasets involving both natural distribution shifts and cross-datasets generalization demonstrate that our method outperforms baselines, validating its effectiveness in mitigating prompt optimization bias.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 10 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2025.
Builds on
10 of 33 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025DynaPrompt: Dynamic Test-Time Prompt Tuning27 Jan
- 2024Online Zero-Shot Classification with CLIP23 Aug
- 2024C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion21 Mar
- 2023Diverse Data Augmentation with Diffusions for Effective Test-time Prompt Tuning11 Aug
Other references · 6
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
- 2022Bayesian Prompt Learning for Image-Language Model Generalizationcited by 51
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models
- 2025MetaTPT: Meta Test-time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
- 2026Improving Calibration in Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Data-Free Flatness-Aware Prompt Pretraining
- 2026Towards Fine-Grained Robustness: Attention-Guided Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
- 2024On the test-time zero-shot generalization of vision-language models: Do we really need prompt learning?
- 2025D-TPT: Dimensional Entropy Maximization for Calibrating Test-Time Prompt Tuning in Vision-Language Models
- 2023Align Your Prompts: Test-Time Prompting with Distribution Alignment for Zero-Shot Generalization
- 2024Generalizable Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models