mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Standing on the Shoulders of Giant Frozen Language Models

arXiv 2204.10019 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2022cs.CL cs.AIcited by 33

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Huge pretrained language models (LMs) have demonstrated surprisingly good zero-shot capabilities on a wide variety of tasks. This gives rise to the appealing vision of a single, versatile model with a wide range of functionalities across disparate applications. However, current leading techniques for leveraging a "frozen" LM -- i.e., leaving its weights untouched -- still often underperform fine-tuning approaches which modify these weights in a task-dependent way. Those, in turn, suffer forgetfulness and compromise versatility, suggesting a tradeoff between performance and versatility. The main message of this paper is that current frozen-model techniques such as prompt tuning are only the tip of the iceberg, and more powerful methods for leveraging frozen LMs can do just as well as fine tuning in challenging domains without sacrificing the underlying model's versatility. To demonstrate this, we introduce three novel methods for leveraging frozen models: input-dependent prompt tuning, frozen readers, and recursive LMs, each of which vastly improves on current frozen-model approaches. Indeed, some of our methods even outperform fine-tuning approaches in domains currently dominated by the latter. The computational cost of each method is higher than that of existing frozen model methods, but still negligible relative to a single pass through a huge frozen LM. Each of these methods constitutes a meaningful contribution in its own right, but by presenting these contributions together we aim to convince the reader of a broader message that goes beyond the details of any given method: that frozen models have untapped potential and that fine-tuning is often unnecessary.

Key facts. Cited by 33 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2022.

Builds on

33 of 38 references.

References · 33

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  5. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  6. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  7. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  8. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  9. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  10. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  11. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  12. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
21 more
  1. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  2. 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,278
  3. 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
  4. 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
  5. 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 713
  6. 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
  7. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
  8. 2021Perceiver IO: A General Architecture for Structured Inputs & Outputscited by 616
  9. 2017Learning multiple visual domains with residual adapterscited by 553
  10. 2021MetaICL: Learning to Learn In Contextcited by 450
  11. 2019On the Relationship between Self-Attention and Convolutional Layerscited by 299
  12. 2021SPoT: Better Frozen Model Adaptation through Soft Prompt Transfercited by 235
  13. 2020Distilling Knowledge from Reader to Retriever for Question Answeringcited by 226
  14. 2021ExT5: Towards Extreme Multi-Task Scaling for Transfer Learningcited by 161
  15. 2021End-to-End Training of Multi-Document Reader and Retriever for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 133
  16. 2020The Cost of Training NLP Models: A Concise Overviewcited by 97
  17. 2021Learning to Retrieve Passages without Supervisioncited by 46
  18. 2021R2-D2: A Modular Baseline for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 37
  19. 2021The Inductive Bias of In-Context Learning: Rethinking Pretraining Example Designcited by 33
  20. 2022Instance-aware Prompt Learning for Language Understanding and Generationcited by 18
  21. 2022Context-Tuning: Learning Contextualized Prompts for Natural Language Generationcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 12; 2023: 12; 2024: 7; 2025: 2.

33 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023In-Context Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 694
  2. 2022Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Taskscited by 554
  3. 2022RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts with Reinforcement Learningcited by 361
  4. 2023RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and Generationcited by 357
  5. 2022Demonstrate-Search-Predict: Composing retrieval and language models for knowledge-intensive NLPcited by 316
  6. 2022Generate rather than Retrieve: Large Language Models are Strong Context Generatorscited by 296
  7. 2022Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data?cited by 173
  8. 2023Domain Specialization as the Key to Make Large Language Models Disruptive: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 134
  9. 2024Let Your Graph Do the Talking: Encoding Structured Data for LLMscited by 112
  10. 2023Improving Language Models via Plug-and-Play Retrieval Feedbackcited by 87
  11. 2022ATTEMPT: Parameter-Efficient Multi-task Tuning via Attentional Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 85
  12. 2022Parallel Context Windows for Large Language Modelscited by 81
21 more
  1. 2023Exploring the Benefits of Training Expert Language Models over Instruction Tuningcited by 80
  2. 2022Contrastive Adapters for Foundation Model Group Robustnesscited by 62
  3. 2023Knowledge Solver: Teaching LLMs to Search for Domain Knowledge from Knowledge Graphscited by 35
  4. 2024SwarmBrain: Embodied agent for real-time strategy game StarCraft II via large language modelscited by 18
  5. 2024To Generate or to Retrieve? On the Effectiveness of Artificial Contexts for Medical Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 15
  6. 2024Revisiting Prefix-tuning: Statistical Benefits of Reparameterization among Promptscited by 15
  7. 2023Federated Prompting and Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Improving LLMs Answeringcited by 14
  8. 2024On the Vulnerability of Applying Retrieval-Augmented Generation within Knowledge-Intensive Application Domainscited by 14
  9. 2023Measuring the Robustness of NLP Models to Domain Shiftscited by 11
  10. 2023Smart Agent-Based Modeling: On the Use of Large Language Models in Computer Simulationscited by 11
  11. 2022Can Foundation Models Help Us Achieve Perfect Secrecy?cited by 9
  12. 2022G-MAP: General Memory-Augmented Pre-trained Language Model for Domain Taskscited by 9
  13. 2024Source Code Foundation Models are Transferable Binary Analysis Knowledge Basescited by 8
  14. 2024Toward Robust RALMs: Revealing the Impact of Imperfect Retrieval on Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 8
  15. 2022Vector-Quantized Input-Contextualized Soft Prompts for Natural Language Understandingcited by 7
  16. 2023Autoregressive Modeling with Lookahead Attentioncited by 7
  17. 2022Structured Prompt Tuningcited by 4
  18. 2023KitchenScale: Learning to predict ingredient quantities from recipe contextscited by 2
  19. 2025From Retrieval to Generation: Comparing Different Approachescited by 2
  20. 2025Retrieval Augmented Question Answering: When Should LLMs Admit Ignorance?cited by 2
  21. 2023NeuroQL: A Neuro-Symbolic Language and Dataset for Inter-Subjective Reasoningcited by 1