mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Revisit Visual Prompt Tuning: The Expressiveness of Prompt Experts

arXiv 2501.18936 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2025cs.LG cs.CVcited by 5

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → Mixture of LoRA experts

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual Prompt Tuning (VPT) has proven effective for parameter-efficient adaptation of pre-trained vision models to downstream tasks by inserting task-specific learnable prompt tokens. Despite its empirical success, a comprehensive theoretical understanding of VPT remains an active area of research. Building on the recently established connection between Mixture of Experts (MoE) and prompt-based methods, wherein each attention head can be conceptualized as a composition of multiple MoE models, we reinterpret VPT as the introduction of new prompt experts into these MoE structures. We identify a key limitation in existing VPT frameworks: the restricted functional expressiveness of prompt experts, which remain static and thus limited in their adaptability. To address this, we propose Visual Adaptive Prompt Tuning (VAPT), a novel method that endows prompt experts with enhanced expressiveness while preserving parameter efficiency. Empirical evaluations on VTAB-1K and FGVC demonstrate that VAPT achieves substantial performance improvements, surpassing fully fine-tuned baselines by 7.34% and 1.04%, respectively. Moreover, VAPT consistently outperforms VPT while requiring fewer additional parameters. Furthermore, our theoretical analysis indicates that VAPT achieves optimal sample efficiency. Collectively, these results underscore the theoretical grounding and empirical advantages of our approach.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mixture of LoRA experts, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 66 of its 92 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2025.

Builds on

66 of 92 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Mixture of Experts Meets Prompt-Based Continual Learning23 May

Other references · 65

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  5. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  6. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  7. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  8. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  9. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  10. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  11. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  12. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
38 more
  1. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  2. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  3. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
  4. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  5. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  6. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
  7. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
  8. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  9. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  10. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,433
  11. 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,369
  12. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
  13. 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,069
  14. 2021Learning to Prompt for Continual Learningcited by 944
  15. 2021GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Expertscited by 897
  16. 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 872
  17. 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 797
  18. 2021Scaling Vision with Sparse Mixture of Expertscited by 747
  19. 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 605
  20. 2017Learning multiple visual domains with residual adapterscited by 557
  21. 2021ConViT: Improving Vision Transformers with Soft Convolutional Inductive Biasescited by 484
  22. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
  23. 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 422
  24. 2023Visual-Language Prompt Tuning with Knowledge-guided Context Optimizationcited by 308
  25. 2013Learning Factored Representations in a Deep Mixture of Expertscited by 278
  26. 2021CPT: Colorful Prompt Tuning for Pre-trained Vision-Language Modelscited by 183
  27. 2022Data Determines Distributional Robustness in Contrastive Language Image Pre-training (CLIP)cited by 138
  28. 2023Scaling Vision-Language Models with Sparse Mixture of Expertscited by 88
  29. 2022Parameter-efficient Model Adaptation for Vision Transformerscited by 81
  30. 2017Fine-Grained Car Detection for Visual Census Estimationcited by 76
  31. 2022Visual Prompt Tuning for Generative Transfer Learningcited by 75
  32. 2023E^2VPT: An Effective and Efficient Approach for Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 70
  33. 2023Diversity-Aware Meta Visual Promptingcited by 58
  34. 2023Improving Visual Prompt Tuning for Self-supervised Vision Transformerscited by 57
  35. 2021How Well Do Sparse Imagenet Models Transfer?cited by 50
  36. 2023On the Role of Attention in Prompt-tuningcited by 50
  37. 2023When Do Prompting and Prefix-Tuning Work? A Theory of Capabilities and Limitationscited by 43
  38. 2019Convergence Rates for Gaussian Mixtures of Expertscited by 39

50 most cited of 65 All 65 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Multitask Vision-Language Prompt Tuning
  2. 2025A Closer Look at Conditional Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  3. 2023VPA: Fully Test-Time Visual Prompt Adaptation
  4. 2025MINT: Memory-Infused Prompt Tuning at Test-time for CLIP
  5. 2022Unified Vision and Language Prompt Learning
  6. 2023Knowledge-Aware Prompt Tuning for Generalizable Vision-Language Models
  7. 2022Exploring Visual Prompts for Adapting Large-Scale Models
  8. 2024Generalizable Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models