A Statistical Viewpoint on Differential Privacy: Hypothesis Testing, Representation and Blackwell's Theorem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Differential privacy is widely considered the formal privacy for privacy-preserving data analysis due to its robust and rigorous guarantees, with increasingly broad adoption in public services, academia, and industry. Despite originating in the cryptographic context, in this review paper we argue that, fundamentally, differential privacy can be considered a textitpure statistical concept. By leveraging David Blackwell's informativeness theorem, our focus is to demonstrate based on prior work that all definitions of differential privacy can be formally motivated from a hypothesis testing perspective, thereby showing that hypothesis testing is not merely convenient but also the right language for reasoning about differential privacy. This insight leads to the definition of f-differential privacy, which extends other differential privacy definitions through a representation theorem. We review techniques that render f-differential privacy a unified framework for analyzing privacy bounds in data analysis and machine learning. Applications of this differential privacy definition to private deep learning, private convex optimization, shuffled mechanisms, and U.S. Census data are discussed to highlight the benefits of analyzing privacy bounds under this framework compared to existing alternatives.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2024.
Builds on
35 of 61 references.
References · 35
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 339
- 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 262
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
- 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 234
- 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 174
- 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 163
- 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 147
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacycited by 139
23 more
- 2020The Discrete Gaussian for Differential Privacycited by 134
- 2019Deep Learning with Gaussian Differential Privacycited by 112
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 97
- 2020Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by Shufflingcited by 96
- 2021Optimal Accounting of Differential Privacy via Characteristic Functioncited by 83
- 2023Federated Learning of Gboard Language Models with Differential Privacycited by 64
- 2022Privacy of Noisy Stochastic Gradient Descent: More Iterations without More Privacy Losscited by 60
- 2022Geographic Spines in the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance Systemcited by 42
- 2019SoK: Differential Privaciescited by 33
- 2021Federated f-Differential Privacycited by 29
- 2022Stronger Privacy Amplification by Shuffling for R'enyi and Approximate Differential Privacycited by 29
- 2020LinkedIn's Audience Engagements API: A Privacy Preserving Data Analytics System at Scalecited by 26
- 2023Advancing Differential Privacy: Where We Are Now and Future Directions for Real-World Deploymentcited by 26
- 2022Edgeworth Accountant: An Analytical Approach to Differential Privacy Compositioncited by 14
- 2023Unified Enhancement of Privacy Bounds for Mixture Mechanisms via f-Differential Privacycited by 13
- 2024Shifted Interpolation for Differential Privacycited by 10
- 2021Canonical Noise Distributions and Private Hypothesis Testscited by 8
- 2021A Central Limit Theorem for Differentially Private Query Answeringcited by 7
- 2022Identification, Amplification and Measurement: A bridge to Gaussian Differential Privacycited by 7
- 2023Gaussian Differential Privacy on Riemannian Manifoldscited by 6
- 2022Log-Concave and Multivariate Canonical Noise Distributions for Differential Privacycited by 5
- 2023Tractable MCMC for Private Learning with Pure and Gaussian Differential Privacycited by 4
- 2023Optimizing Noise for f-Differential Privacy via Anti-Concentration and Stochastic Dominancecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2025Unifying Re-Identification, Attribute Inference, and Data Reconstruction Risks in Differential Privacycited by 11
- 2024The 2020 US Decennial Census is more private than you (might) thinkcited by 4
- 2025Setting varepsilon is not the Issue in Differential Privacycited by 3
- 2025Robust and Differentially Private Principal Component Analysiscited by 1
- 2025Differential privacy from axiomscited by 0
- 2026A Sieve-Accelerated Quadrature Method for Exact Privacy Accounting in the 2020 U.S. Decennial Censuscited by 0
- 2026Deciding When to Switch: E-Processes for Adaptive Minimax Training for Generative Adversarial Netscited by 0
- 2026Algorithmic stability via ensemblingcited by 0
- 2026Algorithmic stability via ensembling9 Sep 2026
- 2026Deciding When to Switch: E-Processes for Adaptive Minimax Training for Generative Adversarial Nets10 Aug 2026
- 2026A Sieve-Accelerated Quadrature Method for Exact Privacy Accounting in the 2020 U.S. Decennial Census29 Jun 2026
- 2025Differential privacy from axioms26 Nov 2025
- 2025Setting varepsilon is not the Issue in Differential Privacy9 Nov 2025
- 2025Robust and Differentially Private Principal Component Analysis21 Jul 2025
- 2025Unifying Re-Identification, Attribute Inference, and Data Reconstruction Risks in Differential Privacy9 Jul 2025
- 2024The 2020 US Decennial Census is more private than you (might) think11 Oct 2024