mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The 2020 US Decennial Census is more private than you (might) think

arXiv 2410.09296 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2024cs.CR cs.DS stat.APcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The U.S. Decennial Census serves as the foundation for many high-profile policy decision-making processes, including federal funding allocation and redistricting. In 2020, the Census Bureau adopted differential privacy to protect the confidentiality of individual responses through a disclosure avoidance system that injects noise into census data tabulations. The Bureau subsequently posed an open question: Could stronger privacy guarantees be obtained for the 2020 U.S. Census compared to their published guarantees, or equivalently, had the privacy budgets been fully utilized? In this paper, we address this question affirmatively by demonstrating that the 2020 U.S. Census provides significantly stronger privacy protections than its nominal guarantees suggest at each of the eight geographical levels, from the national level down to the block level. This finding is enabled by our precise tracking of privacy losses using f-differential privacy, applied to the composition of private queries across these geographical levels. Our analysis reveals that the Census Bureau introduced unnecessarily high levels of noise to meet the specified privacy guarantees for the 2020 Census. Consequently, we show that noise variances could be reduced by 15.08% to 24.82% while maintaining nearly the same level of privacy protection for each geographical level, thereby improving the accuracy of privatized census statistics. We empirically demonstrate that reducing noise injection into census statistics mitigates distortion caused by privacy constraints in downstream applications of private census data, illustrated through a study examining the relationship between earnings and education.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2024.

Builds on

17 of 62 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
  2. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 339
  3. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
  4. 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 174
  5. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacycited by 139
  6. 2020The Discrete Gaussian for Differential Privacycited by 134
  7. 2021The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure Aggregationcited by 127
  8. 2019Deep Learning with Gaussian Differential Privacycited by 112
  9. 2021Optimal Accounting of Differential Privacy via Characteristic Functioncited by 83
  10. 2022Geographic Spines in the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance Systemcited by 42
  11. 2021The Impact of the U.S. Census Disclosure Avoidance System on Redistricting and Voting Rights Analysiscited by 18
  12. 2022Confidence-Ranked Reconstruction of Census Microdata from Published Statisticscited by 15
5 more
  1. 2023Unified Enhancement of Privacy Bounds for Mixture Mechanisms via f-Differential Privacycited by 13
  2. 2021Making the Most of Parallel Composition in Differential Privacycited by 9
  3. 2024A Statistical Viewpoint on Differential Privacy: Hypothesis Testing, Representation and Blackwell's Theoremcited by 8
  4. 2022Bayesian and Frequentist Semantics for Common Variations of Differential Privacy: Applications to the 2020 Censuscited by 6
  5. 2023Evaluating Bias and Noise Induced by the U.S. Census Bureau's Privacy Protection Methodscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.