mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Central Limit Theorem for Differentially Private Query Answering

arXiv 2103.08721 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2021stat.ML cs.CR cs.ITcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Perhaps the single most important use case for differential privacy is to privately answer numerical queries, which is usually achieved by adding noise to the answer vector. The central question, therefore, is to understand which noise distribution optimizes the privacy-accuracy trade-off, especially when the dimension of the answer vector is high. Accordingly, extensive literature has been dedicated to the question and the upper and lower bounds have been matched up to constant factors [BUV18, SU17]. In this paper, we take a novel approach to address this important optimality question. We first demonstrate an intriguing central limit theorem phenomenon in the high-dimensional regime. More precisely, we prove that a mechanism is approximately Gaussian Differentially Private [DRS21] if the added noise satisfies certain conditions. In particular, densities proportional to e-|x|pα, where |x|p is the standard ℓp-norm, satisfies the conditions. Taking this perspective, we make use of the Cramer--Rao inequality and show an "uncertainty principle"-style result: the product of the privacy parameter and the ℓ2-loss of the mechanism is lower bounded by the dimension. Furthermore, the Gaussian mechanism achieves the constant-sharp optimal privacy-accuracy trade-off among all such noises. Our findings are corroborated by numerical experiments.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2021.

Builds on

14 of 42 references.

References · 14

  1. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 297
  2. 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 272
  3. 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 218
  4. 2013Fingerprinting Codes and the Price of Approximate Differential Privacycited by 82
  5. 2015Between Pure and Approximate Differential Privacycited by 56
  6. 2017Prochlo: Strong Privacy for Analytics in the Crowdcited by 51
  7. 2019The Power of Factorization Mechanisms in Local and Central Differential Privacycited by 30
  8. 2019Differentially Private Algorithms for Learning Mixtures of Separated Gaussianscited by 27
  9. 2020LinkedIn's Audience Engagements API: A Privacy Preserving Data Analytics System at Scalecited by 26
  10. 2017Towards Practical Differential Privacy for SQL Queriescited by 19
  11. 2020The Cost of Privacy in Generalized Linear Models: Algorithms and Minimax Lower Boundscited by 15
  12. 2020A bounded-noise mechanism for differential privacycited by 15
2 more
  1. 2020On Avoiding the Union Bound When Answering Multiple Differentially Private Queriescited by 5
  2. 2019Optimal Differential Privacy Composition for Exponential Mechanisms and the Cost of Adaptivitycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.