Edgeworth Accountant: An Analytical Approach to Differential Privacy Composition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In privacy-preserving data analysis, many procedures and algorithms are structured as compositions of multiple private building blocks. As such, an important question is how to efficiently compute the overall privacy loss under composition. This paper introduces the Edgeworth Accountant, an analytical approach to composing differential privacy guarantees for private algorithms. Leveraging the f-differential privacy framework, the Edgeworth Accountant accurately tracks privacy loss under composition, enabling a closed-form expression of privacy guarantees through privacy-loss log-likelihood ratios (PLLRs). As implied by its name, this method applies the Edgeworth expansion to estimate and define the probability distribution of the sum of the PLLRs. Furthermore, by using a technique that simplifies complex distributions into simpler ones, we demonstrate the Edgeworth Accountant's applicability to any noise-addition mechanism. Its main advantage is providing (ε, δ)-differential privacy bounds that are non-asymptotic and do not significantly increase computational cost. This feature sets it apart from previous approaches, in which the running time increases with the number of mechanisms under composition. We conclude by showing how our Edgeworth Accountant offers accurate estimates and tight upper and lower bounds on (ε, δ)-differential privacy guarantees, especially tailored for training private models in deep learning and federated analytics.
Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2022.
Builds on
11 of 24 references.
References · 11
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 339
- 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
- 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 234
- 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 216
- 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 174
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacycited by 139
- 2019Deep Learning with Gaussian Differential Privacycited by 112
- 2021Optimal Accounting of Differential Privacy via Characteristic Functioncited by 83
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
14 papers.
Sort:
- 2022Privately Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with Differential Privacycited by 39
- 2023Differentially Private Natural Language Models: Recent Advances and Future Directionscited by 20
- 2023Bounding data reconstruction attacks with the hypothesis testing interpretation of differential privacycited by 14
- 2023Unified Enhancement of Privacy Bounds for Mixture Mechanisms via f-Differential Privacycited by 13
- 2023A Randomized Approach for Tight Privacy Accountingcited by 11
- 2024Neural Collapse Meets Differential Privacy: Curious Behaviors of NoisyGD with Near-perfect Representation Learningcited by 8
- 2024A Statistical Viewpoint on Differential Privacy: Hypothesis Testing, Representation and Blackwell's Theoremcited by 8
- 2022The Saddle-Point Accountant for Differential Privacycited by 5
- 2025Machine Learning with Privacy for Protected Attributescited by 2
- 2024Universally Harmonizing Differential Privacy Mechanisms for Federated Learning: Boosting Accuracy and Convergencecited by 1
- 2026Trade-off Functions for DP-SGD with Subsampling based on Random Allocation: Tight Upper and Lower Boundscited by 1
- 2022Generalised Likelihood Ratio Testing Adversaries through the Differential Privacy Lenscited by 0
- 2026Differentially Private Natural Gradient Descent7 Jul 2026
- 2026Trade-off Functions for DP-SGD with Subsampling based on Random Allocation: Tight Upper and Lower Bounds7 May 2026
- 2025Machine Learning with Privacy for Protected Attributes24 Jun 2025
- 2024A Statistical Viewpoint on Differential Privacy: Hypothesis Testing, Representation and Blackwell's Theorem14 Sep 2024
- 2024Universally Harmonizing Differential Privacy Mechanisms for Federated Learning: Boosting Accuracy and Convergence20 Jul 2024
- 2024Neural Collapse Meets Differential Privacy: Curious Behaviors of NoisyGD with Near-perfect Representation Learning14 May 2024
- 2023Enhancing Trade-offs in Privacy, Utility, and Computational Efficiency through MUltistage Sampling Technique (MUST)20 Dec 2023
- 2023Unified Enhancement of Privacy Bounds for Mixture Mechanisms via f-Differential Privacy30 Oct 2023
- 2023Bounding data reconstruction attacks with the hypothesis testing interpretation of differential privacy8 Jul 2023
- 2023A Randomized Approach for Tight Privacy Accounting17 Apr 2023
- 2023Differentially Private Natural Language Models: Recent Advances and Future Directions22 Jan 2023
- 2022Privately Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with Differential Privacy26 Oct 2022
2 more
- 2022Privately Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with Differential Privacycited by 39
- 2023Differentially Private Natural Language Models: Recent Advances and Future Directionscited by 20
- 2023Bounding data reconstruction attacks with the hypothesis testing interpretation of differential privacycited by 14
- 2023Unified Enhancement of Privacy Bounds for Mixture Mechanisms via f-Differential Privacycited by 13
- 2023A Randomized Approach for Tight Privacy Accountingcited by 11
- 2024Neural Collapse Meets Differential Privacy: Curious Behaviors of NoisyGD with Near-perfect Representation Learningcited by 8
- 2024A Statistical Viewpoint on Differential Privacy: Hypothesis Testing, Representation and Blackwell's Theoremcited by 8
- 2022The Saddle-Point Accountant for Differential Privacycited by 5
- 2025Machine Learning with Privacy for Protected Attributescited by 2
- 2024Universally Harmonizing Differential Privacy Mechanisms for Federated Learning: Boosting Accuracy and Convergencecited by 1
- 2026Trade-off Functions for DP-SGD with Subsampling based on Random Allocation: Tight Upper and Lower Boundscited by 1
- 2022Generalised Likelihood Ratio Testing Adversaries through the Differential Privacy Lenscited by 0
12 most cited of 14 All 14 (JSON)
- 2026Differentially Private Natural Gradient Descent7 Jul 2026
- 2026Trade-off Functions for DP-SGD with Subsampling based on Random Allocation: Tight Upper and Lower Bounds7 May 2026
- 2025Machine Learning with Privacy for Protected Attributes24 Jun 2025
- 2024A Statistical Viewpoint on Differential Privacy: Hypothesis Testing, Representation and Blackwell's Theorem14 Sep 2024
- 2024Universally Harmonizing Differential Privacy Mechanisms for Federated Learning: Boosting Accuracy and Convergence20 Jul 2024
- 2024Neural Collapse Meets Differential Privacy: Curious Behaviors of NoisyGD with Near-perfect Representation Learning14 May 2024
- 2023Enhancing Trade-offs in Privacy, Utility, and Computational Efficiency through MUltistage Sampling Technique (MUST)20 Dec 2023
- 2023Unified Enhancement of Privacy Bounds for Mixture Mechanisms via f-Differential Privacy30 Oct 2023
- 2023Bounding data reconstruction attacks with the hypothesis testing interpretation of differential privacy8 Jul 2023
- 2023A Randomized Approach for Tight Privacy Accounting17 Apr 2023
- 2023Differentially Private Natural Language Models: Recent Advances and Future Directions22 Jan 2023
- 2022Privately Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with Differential Privacy26 Oct 2022
12 newest of 14 All 14 (JSON)