Tractable MCMC for Private Learning with Pure and Gaussian Differential Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Posterior sampling, i.e., exponential mechanism to sample from the posterior distribution, provides varepsilon-pure differential privacy (DP) guarantees and does not suffer from potentially unbounded privacy breach introduced by (varepsilon,δ)-approximate DP. In practice, however, one needs to apply approximate sampling methods such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), thus re-introducing the unappealing δ-approximation error into the privacy guarantees. To bridge this gap, we propose the Approximate SAample Perturbation (abbr. ASAP) algorithm which perturbs an MCMC sample with noise proportional to its Wasserstein-infinity (W_∞) distance from a reference distribution that satisfies pure DP or pure Gaussian DP (i.e., δ=0). We then leverage a Metropolis-Hastings algorithm to generate the sample and prove that the algorithm converges in W_∞ distance. We show that by combining our new techniques with a localization step, we obtain the first nearly linear-time algorithm that achieves the optimal rates in the DP-ERM problem with strongly convex and smooth losses.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2023.
Builds on
17 of 38 references.
References · 17
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2023Handbook of Convergence Theorems for (Stochastic) Gradient Methodscited by 163
- 2020Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in Linear Timecited by 153
- 2018Log-concave sampling: Metropolis-Hastings algorithms are fastcited by 118
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 100
- 2022Automatic Clipping: Differentially Private Deep Learning Made Easier and Strongercited by 88
- 2021Optimal Accounting of Differential Privacy via Characteristic Functioncited by 86
- 2021Differential Privacy Dynamics of Langevin Diffusion and Noisy Gradient Descentcited by 73
- 2018Sampling Can Be Faster Than Optimizationcited by 68
- 2015Privacy for Free: Posterior Sampling and Stochastic Gradient Monte Carlocited by 63
- 2022Private Convex Optimization via Exponential Mechanismcited by 49
- 2018Global linear convergence of Newton's method without strong-convexity or Lipschitz gradientscited by 24
5 more
- 2022Resolving the Mixing Time of the Langevin Algorithm to its Stationary Distribution for Log-Concave Samplingcited by 22
- 2022Differential Privacy Guarantees for Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamicscited by 19
- 2017R'enyi Differential Privacy Mechanisms for Posterior Samplingcited by 16
- 2021Sampling from Log-Concave Distributions with Infinity-Distance Guaranteescited by 8
- 2022Exact Privacy Guarantees for Markov Chain Implementations of the Exponential Mechanism with Artificial Atomscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024A Statistical Viewpoint on Differential Privacy: Hypothesis Testing, Representation and Blackwell's Theoremcited by 8
- 2024Log-concave Sampling from a Convex Body with a Barrier: a Robust and Unified Dikin Walkcited by 2
- 2025Purifying Approximate Differential Privacy with Randomized Post-processingcited by 2
- 2023Are Normalizing Flows the Key to Unlocking the Exponential Mechanism?cited by 0
- 2025Purifying Approximate Differential Privacy with Randomized Post-processing27 Mar 2025
- 2024Log-concave Sampling from a Convex Body with a Barrier: a Robust and Unified Dikin Walk8 Oct 2024
- 2024A Statistical Viewpoint on Differential Privacy: Hypothesis Testing, Representation and Blackwell's Theorem14 Sep 2024
- 2023Are Normalizing Flows the Key to Unlocking the Exponential Mechanism?15 Nov 2023