Quasimetric Value Functions with Dense Rewards
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Deep RL algorithms and representations
Abstract (arXiv)
As a generalization of reinforcement learning (RL) to parametrizable goals, goal conditioned RL (GCRL) has a broad range of applications, particularly in challenging tasks in robotics. Recent work has established that the optimal value function of GCRL Q^ast(s,a,g) has a quasimetric structure, leading to targetted neural architectures that respect such structure. However, the relevant analyses assume a sparse reward setting -- a known aggravating factor to sample complexity. We show that the key property underpinning a quasimetric, viz., the triangle inequality, is preserved under a dense reward setting as well. Contrary to earlier findings where dense rewards were shown to be detrimental to GCRL, we identify the key condition necessary for triangle inequality. Dense reward functions that satisfy this condition can only improve, never worsen, sample complexity. This opens up opportunities to train efficient neural architectures with dense rewards, compounding their benefits to sample complexity. We evaluate this proposal in 12 standard benchmark environments in GCRL featuring challenging continuous control tasks. Our empirical results confirm that training a quasimetric value function in our dense reward setting indeed outperforms training with sparse rewards.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 12 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2024.
Builds on
12 of 19 references.
References · 12
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2016#Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 309
- 2018Multi-Goal Reinforcement Learning: Challenging Robotics Environments and Request for Researchcited by 260
- 2022Contrastive Learning as Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 253
- 2022Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning: Problems and Solutionscited by 158
- 2023Optimal Goal-Reaching Reinforcement Learning via Quasimetric Learningcited by 121
- 2022Unpacking Reward Shaping: Understanding the Benefits of Reward Engineering on Sample Complexitycited by 62
- 2017Hybrid Reward Architecture for Reinforcement Learningcited by 58
- 2021Adversarial Intrinsic Motivation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
- 2020An Inductive Bias for Distances: Neural Nets that Respect the Triangle Inequalitycited by 24
- 2022On the Learning and Learnability of Quasimetricscited by 15
- 2022Metric Residual Networks for Sample Efficient Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
- 2025Unifying Agent Interaction and World Information for Multi-agent Coordination29 Sep 2025
- 2025Intention-Conditioned Flow Occupancy Models10 Jun 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Offline Goal-conditioned Reinforcement Learning with Quasimetric Representations
- 2025Goal Reaching with Eikonal-Constrained Hierarchical Quasimetric Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Learning Goal-Reaching Quasimetric Geometry From Finite-Time Reachability
- 2025Towards better dense rewards in Reinforcement Learning Applications
- 2026From Connectivity to Rewards: Dense Reward Learning with Directed State Graphs
- 2024On-Robot Reinforcement Learning with Goal-Contrastive Rewards
- 2023Provably Efficient Offline Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning with General Function Approximation and Single-Policy Concentrability
- 2024Combining Automated Optimisation of Hyperparameters and Reward Shape