mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Role of Deep Learning Regularizations on Actors in Offline RL

arXiv 2409.07606 ↗First posted 11 Sep 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Offline RL algorithms

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning regularization techniques, such as dropout, layer normalization, or weight decay, are widely adopted in the construction of modern artificial neural networks, often resulting in more robust training processes and improved generalization capabilities. However, in the domain of Reinforcement Learning (RL), the application of these techniques has been limited, usually applied to value function estimators (Hiraoka et al., 2021; Smith et al., 2022), and may result in detrimental effects. This issue is even more pronounced in offline RL settings, which bear greater similarity to supervised learning but have received less attention. Recent work in continuous offline RL (Park et al., 2024) has demonstrated that while we can build sufficiently powerful critic networks, the generalization of actor networks remains a bottleneck. In this study, we empirically show that applying standard regularization techniques to actor networks in offline RL actor-critic algorithms yields improvements of 6% on average across two algorithms and three different continuous D4RL domains.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Offline RL algorithms, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 41 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2024.

Builds on

41 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 18

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?13 Jun
  2. 2024Is Value Functions Estimation with Classification Plug-and-play for Offline Reinforcement Learning?10 Jun
  3. 2023Improving and Benchmarking Offline Reinforcement Learning Algorithms1 Jun
  4. 2023Revisiting the Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learning16 May
  5. 2023Balancing policy constraint and ensemble size in uncertainty-based offline reinforcement learning26 Mar
  6. 2023Anti-Exploration by Random Network Distillation31 Jan
  7. 2022Offline Q-Learning on Diverse Multi-Task Data Both Scales And Generalizes28 Nov
  8. 2022Q-Ensemble for Offline RL: Don't Scale the Ensemble, Scale the Batch Size20 Nov
  9. 2022CORL: Research-oriented Deep Offline Reinforcement Learning Library13 Oct
  10. 2022RORL: Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning via Conservative Smoothing6 Jun
  11. 2022Why So Pessimistic? Estimating Uncertainties for Offline RL through Ensembles, and Why Their Independence Matters27 May
  12. 2022Latent-Variable Advantage-Weighted Policy Optimization for Offline RL16 Mar
6 more
  1. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learning12 Oct
  2. 2021Uncertainty-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Diversified Q-Ensemble4 Oct
  3. 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learning12 Jun
  4. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning8 Jun
  5. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems4 May
  6. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning15 Apr

Other references · 23

  1. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  2. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
  3. 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,528
  4. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,514
  5. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
  6. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
  7. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 774
  8. 2023Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datacited by 332
  9. 2018A disciplined approach to neural network hyper-parameters: Part 1 -- learning rate, batch size, momentum, and weight decaycited by 223
  10. 2015Adding Gradient Noise Improves Learning for Very Deep Networkscited by 144
  11. 2024Stop Regressing: Training Value Functions via Classification for Scalable Deep RLcited by 136
  12. 2020Implicit Under-Parameterization Inhibits Data-Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 134
11 more
  1. 2022Understanding and Preventing Capacity Loss in Reinforcement Learningcited by 124
  2. 2021Dropout Q-Functions for Doubly Efficient Reinforcement Learningcited by 108
  3. 2017Regularization for Deep Learning: A Taxonomycited by 91
  4. 2022A Walk in the Park: Learning to Walk in 20 Minutes With Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 76
  5. 2021Spectral Normalisation for Deep Reinforcement Learning: an Optimisation Perspectivecited by 64
  6. 2023Hyperparameters in Reinforcement Learning and How To Tune Themcited by 58
  7. 2021Muesli: Combining Improvements in Policy Optimizationcited by 53
  8. 2024Exploration and Anti-Exploration with Distributional Random Network Distillationcited by 32
  9. 2024No Representation, No Trust: Connecting Representation, Collapse, and Trust Issues in PPOcited by 27
  10. 2022Let Offline RL Flow: Training Conservative Agents in the Latent Space of Normalizing Flowscited by 21
  11. 2021FeatureNorm: L2 Feature Normalization for Dynamic Graph Embeddingcited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022An Empirical Study of Implicit Regularization in Deep Offline RL
  2. 2021DR3: Value-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning Requires Explicit Regularization
  3. 2023A Connection between One-Step Regularization and Critic Regularization in Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2022Model-Based Offline Meta-Reinforcement Learning with Regularization
  5. 2023The Generalization Gap in Offline Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2026Simple Actors and Deep Critics for Scalable Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2024Integrating Domain Knowledge for handling Limited Data in Offline RL
  8. 2019Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learning