mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Critical Thinking in Education by means of a Socratic Chatbot

arXiv 2409.05511 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2024cs.HCcited by 21

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

While large language models (LLMs) are increasingly playing a pivotal role in education by providing instantaneous, adaptive responses, their potential to promote critical thinking remains understudied. In this paper, we fill such a gap and present an innovative educational chatbot designed to foster critical thinking through Socratic questioning. Unlike traditional intelligent tutoring systems, including educational chatbots, that tend to offer direct answers, the proposed Socratic tutor encourages students to explore various perspectives and engage in self-reflection by posing structured, thought-provoking questions. Our Socratic questioning is implemented by fine and prompt-tuning the open-source pretrained LLM with a specialized dataset that stimulates critical thinking and offers multiple viewpoints. In an effort to democratize access and to protect the students' privacy, the proposed tutor is based on small LLMs (Llama2 7B and 13B-parameter models) that are able to run locally on off-the-shelf hardware. We validate our approach in a battery of experiments consisting of interactions between a simulated student and the chatbot to evaluate its effectiveness in enhancing critical thinking skills. Results indicate that the Socratic tutor supports the development of reflection and critical thinking significantly better than standard chatbots. Our approach opens the door for improving educational outcomes by cultivating active learning and encouraging intellectual autonomy.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 7 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2024.

Builds on

7 of 42 references.

References · 7

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2019Recent Advances in Neural Question Generationcited by 42
  4. 2022Automatic Generation of Socratic Subquestions for Teaching Math Word Problemscited by 42
  5. 2024Synthetic Dialogue Dataset Generation using LLM Agentscited by 39
  6. 2023Let GPT be a Math Tutor: Teaching Math Word Problem Solvers with Customized Exercise Generationcited by 27
  7. 2024Response Generation for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with Large Language Models: Comparative Study with Socratic Questioningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 12; 2026: 9.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Position: LLMs Can be Good Tutors in English Educationcited by 6
  2. 2025Discerning minds or generic tutors? Evaluating instructional guidance capabilities in Socratic LLMscited by 5
  3. 2025ClearFairy: Capturing Creative Workflows through Decision Structuring, In-Situ Questioning, and Rationale Inferencecited by 4
  4. 2025How Problematic Writer-AI Interactions (Rather than Problematic AI) Hinder Writers' Idea Generationcited by 2
  5. 2025Benchmarking Critical Questions Generation: A Challenging Reasoning Task for Large Language Modelscited by 2
  6. 2025Iffy-Or-Not: Extending the Web to Support the Critical Evaluation of Fallacious Textscited by 1
  7. 2025Ethics and Persuasion in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Procedural Rhetorical Approachcited by 1
  8. 2026ConvoLearn: A Learning Sciences Grounded Dataset for Fine-Tuning Dialogic AI Tutorscited by 1
  9. 2025AITEE -- Agentic Tutor for Electrical Engineeringcited by 0
  10. 2025ELLIS Alicante at CQs-Gen 2025: Winning the critical thinking questions shared task: LLM-based question generation and selectioncited by 0
  11. 2025Human-AI collaboration or obedient and often clueless AI in instruct, serve, repeat dynamics?cited by 0
  12. 2025LLM Chatbot-Creation Approachescited by 0
9 more
  1. 2025Examining Student Interactions with a Pedagogical AI-Assistant for Essay Writing and their Impact on Students Writing Qualitycited by 0
  2. 2026MetaCues: Enabling Critical Engagement with Generative AI for Information Seeking and Sensemakingcited by 0
  3. 2026BLADE: Better Language Answers through Dialogue and Explanationscited by 0
  4. 2026Hey Chat, Can You Teach Me? Structuring Socratic Dialogue for Human Learning in the Wildcited by 0
  5. 2026SCAN: A Decision-Making Framework for Effective Task Allocation with Generative AIcited by 0
  6. 2026Curiosity as Linguistic Intervention: Using LLM Tutoring Dialogues to Influence Exploratory Learning Behaviorcited by 0
  7. 2026Reflective Dialogue or Prompt Refinement? Effects of Tutor Scaffolding on Students' Independent LLM Use for Programmingcited by 0
  8. 2026The Theoretical Foundation of Socratic Tests: Dynamic, Multimodal, Conversational Examinationscited by 0
  9. 2026Investigating the Impacts of Generative AI on Information Seekingcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Critical Inker: Scaffolding Critical Thinking in AI-Assisted Writing Through Socratic Questioning
  2. 2024LLaMa-SciQ: An Educational Chatbot for Answering Science MCQ
  3. 2025SocraticAI: Transforming LLMs into Guided CS Tutors Through Scaffolded Interaction
  4. 2025Beyond Automation: Socratic AI, Epistemic Agency, and the Implications of the Emergence of Orchestrated Multi-Agent Learning Architectures
  5. 2024Improving Socratic Question Generation using Data Augmentation and Preference Optimization
  6. 2026Teaching a Large Language Model Tutor to Withhold the Answer: A Supervisor Architecture and an Evidence-Driven Method for Tuning Socratic Behavior ↗
  7. 2024TeachTune: Reviewing Pedagogical Agents Against Diverse Student Profiles with Simulated Students
  8. 2024Boosting Large Language Models with Socratic Method for Conversational Mathematics Teaching