SCAN: A Decision-Making Framework for Effective Task Allocation with Generative AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce SCAN -- a human-centric decision-making framework to facilitate learners for effective task allocation with Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) based on Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development and Metacognition. In SCAN, we systematize and formalize AI-human interaction by introducing a task-identification approach with four "sub-zones": Substitute, Complement, Aid, and Non-negotiable. After describing the four sub-zones, we demonstrate how SCAN framework can be applied for knowledge workers in the workplace and students in education to metacognitively "scan" their use of Generative AI. We then discuss how such framework can be related to cognitive load theory, cognitive offloading, sycophancy, three decision-making modes in human-AI interactions (automation, augmentation, and collaboration), future of work such as upskilling and deskilling, and how it accounts for both human-human and human-AI learning. We propose that SCAN offers a great starting point before discussing whether GenAI complements or replaces our abilities when completing a task, with a general objective of sustaining lifelong learning, and a specific goal of reaching hybrid intelligence.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 153 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2026.
Builds on
24 of 153 references.
References · 24
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
- 2023Generative AIcited by 119
- 2024When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysiscited by 100
- 2024Sycophancy in Large Language Models: Causes and Mitigationscited by 97
- 2023The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AIcited by 85
- 2023Appropriate Reliance on AI Advice: Conceptualization and the Effect of Explanationscited by 80
- 2025Levels of Autonomy for AI Agentscited by 45
- 2024Complementarity in Human-AI Collaboration: Concept, Sources, and Evidencecited by 35
- 2025Vibe coding: programming through conversation with artificial intelligencecited by 26
- 2024Enhancing Critical Thinking in Education by means of a Socratic Chatbotcited by 21
- 2024Ironies of Generative AI: Understanding and mitigating productivity loss in human-AI interactionscited by 20
- 2024Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learningcited by 17
12 more
- 2025Truly Self-Improving Agents Require Intrinsic Metacognitive Learningcited by 13
- 2025AI, Help Me Thinkunicodex2014but for Myself: Assisting People in Complex Decision-Making by Providing Different Kinds of Cognitive Supportcited by 12
- 2024Performance and Metacognition Disconnect when Reasoning in Human-AI Interactioncited by 10
- 2025De-skilling, Cognitive Offloading, and Misplaced Responsibilities: Potential Ironies of AI-Assisted Designcited by 10
- 2022Conversational agents for fostering curiosity-driven learning in childrencited by 7
- 2025"It makes you think": Provocations Help Restore Critical Thinking to AI-Assisted Knowledge Workcited by 4
- 2022Imagining Future Digital Assistants at Work: A Study of Task Management Needscited by 3
- 2024A Systematic Review of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning Practicecited by 3
- 2024Complement or substitute? How AI increases the demand for human skillscited by 3
- 2025Coach not crutch: Evidence that AI can improve writing skill despite reducing effortcited by 3
- 2025When Autonomy Breaks: The Hidden Existential Risk of AIcited by 2
- 2026Position: AI as Part of Self -- Extending the Mind Requires Cognitive Co-Regulationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.