Benchmarking Critical Questions Generation: A Challenging Reasoning Task for Large Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
The task of Critical Questions Generation (CQs-Gen) aims to foster critical thinking by enabling systems to generate questions that expose underlying assumptions and challenge the validity of argumentative reasoning structures. Despite growing interest in this area, progress has been hindered by the lack of suitable datasets and automatic evaluation standards. This paper presents a comprehensive approach to support the development and benchmarking of systems for this task. We construct the first large-scale dataset including ~5K manually annotated questions. We also investigate automatic evaluation methods and propose reference-based techniques as the strategy that best correlates with human judgments. Our zero-shot evaluation of 11 LLMs establishes a strong baseline while showcasing the difficulty of the task. Data and code plus a public leaderboard are provided to encourage further research, not only in terms of model performance, but also to explore the practical benefits of CQs-Gen for both automated reasoning and human critical thinking.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 10 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2025.
Builds on
10 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report27 Dec
- 2024Enhancing Critical Thinking in Education by means of a Socratic Chatbot9 Sep
Other references · 8
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2023JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judgescited by 367
- 2024Standardizing the Measurement of Text Diversity: A Tool and a Comparative Analysis of Scorescited by 50
- 2024SemScore: Automated Evaluation of Instruction-Tuned LLMs based on Semantic Textual Similaritycited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Generate-Then-Validate: A Novel Question Generation Approach Using Small Language Models
- 2026Automated Benchmark Generation from Domain Guidelines Informed by Bloom's Taxonomy
- 2026CoDiQ: Test-Time Scaling for Controllable Difficult Question Generation
- 2024The Future of Learning in the Age of Generative AI: Automated Question Generation and Assessment with Large Language Models
- 2026Macaron: Controlled, Human-Written Benchmark for Multilingual and Multicultural Reasoning via Template-Filling
- 2025Encyclo-K: Evaluating LLMs with Dynamically Composed Knowledge Statements
- 2026KNIGHT: Knowledge Graph-Driven Multiple-Choice Question Generation with Adaptive Hardness Calibration
- 2024Rethinking Generative Large Language Model Evaluation for Semantic Comprehension