mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Critical Inker: Scaffolding Critical Thinking in AI-Assisted Writing Through Socratic Questioning

arXiv 2604.07167 ↗First posted 8 Apr 2026cs.HCcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

As Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly automate writing tasks, there is a growing risk of cognitive deskilling where users offload critical thinking to the system. To address this, we introduce Critical Inker, a writing tool designed to scaffold critical reflection during writing through logical analysis and socratic feedback. We present two methods: (1) A Socratic chatbot using questions to help them realize and fix logical errors in their writing and (2) Visual Feedback, which highlights logical errors in the text without dialog. We detail the technical implementation of the system and evaluate its argument extraction and logical validity accuracy. Our evaluation shows a 91.2% argument overlap with ground truth argument annotations and 87% validity accuracy. Finally, we conducted a small-scale pilot and discuss early qualitative results.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 4 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.

Builds on

4 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Large Language Models Are Better Logical Fallacy Reasoners with Counterargument, Explanation, and Goal-Aware Prompt Formulation30 Mar

Other references · 3

  1. 2025Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Taskcited by 103
  2. 2025Dialogues with AI Reduce Beliefs in Misinformation but Build No Lasting Discernment Skillscited by 4
  3. 2025IntelliProof: An Argumentation Network-based Conversational Helper for Organized Reflectioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Prober.ai: Gated Inquiry-Based Feedback via LLM-Constrained Personas for Argumentative Writing Development
  2. 2024Enhancing Critical Thinking in Education by means of a Socratic Chatbot
  3. 2025Voice Interaction With Conversational AI Could Facilitate Thoughtful Reflection and Substantive Revision in Writing
  4. 2026PaperMentor: A Human-Centered Multi-Agent Writing Tutor for AI Research Papers on Overleaf
  5. 2025Toward LLM-Supported Automated Assessment of Critical Thinking Subskills
  6. 2025MAGIC: Multi-Agent Argumentation and Grammar Integrated Critiquer
  7. 2025MetaCrit: A Critical Thinking Framework for Self-Regulated LLM Reasoning
  8. 2025SocraticAI: Transforming LLMs into Guided CS Tutors Through Scaffolded Interaction