Geometry-Aware Feature Matching for Large-Scale Structure from Motion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Establishing consistent and dense correspondences across multiple images is crucial for Structure from Motion (SfM) systems. Significant view changes, such as air-to-ground with very sparse view overlap, pose an even greater challenge to the correspondence solvers. We present a novel optimization-based approach that significantly enhances existing feature matching methods by introducing geometry cues in addition to color cues. This helps fill gaps when there is less overlap in large-scale scenarios. Our method formulates geometric verification as an optimization problem, guiding feature matching within detector-free methods and using sparse correspondences from detector-based methods as anchor points. By enforcing geometric constraints via the Sampson Distance, our approach ensures that the denser correspondences from detector-free methods are geometrically consistent and more accurate. This hybrid strategy significantly improves correspondence density and accuracy, mitigates multi-view inconsistencies, and leads to notable advancements in camera pose accuracy and point cloud density. It outperforms state-of-the-art feature matching methods on benchmark datasets and enables feature matching in challenging extreme large-scale settings.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2024.
Builds on
28 of 50 references.
References · 28
- 20233D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Renderingcited by 6,226
- 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,443
- 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,320
- 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 984
- 2018MegaDepth: Learning Single-View Depth Prediction from Internet Photoscited by 737
- 2023LightGlue: Local Feature Matching at Light Speedcited by 590
- 2016LIFT: Learned Invariant Feature Transformcited by 306
- 2023RoMa: Robust Dense Feature Matchingcited by 302
- 2017HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptorscited by 264
- 2020Image Matching across Wide Baselines: From Paper to Practicecited by 225
- 2021Pixel-Perfect Structure-from-Motion with Featuremetric Refinementcited by 200
- 2022DKM: Dense Kernelized Feature Matching for Geometry Estimationcited by 177
16 more
- 2018Neighbourhood Consensus Networkscited by 174
- 2022ASpanFormer: Detector-Free Image Matching with Adaptive Span Transformercited by 171
- 2020Patch2Pix: Epipolar-Guided Pixel-Level Correspondencescited by 129
- 2022MatchFormer: Interleaving Attention in Transformers for Feature Matchingcited by 126
- 2023ALIKED: A Lighter Keypoint and Descriptor Extraction Network via Deformable Transformationcited by 121
- 2024Efficient LoFTR: Semi-Dense Local Feature Matching with Sparse-Like Speedcited by 120
- 2022RelPose: Predicting Probabilistic Relative Rotation for Single Objects in the Wildcited by 102
- 2020Efficient Neighbourhood Consensus Networks via Submanifold Sparse Convolutionscited by 93
- 2018DS-SLAM: A Semantic Visual SLAM towards Dynamic Environmentscited by 91
- 2020Dual-Resolution Correspondence Networkscited by 90
- 2017SfM-Net: Learning of Structure and Motion from Videocited by 89
- 2016Universal Correspondence Networkcited by 82
- 2022Adaptive Assignment for Geometry Aware Local Feature Matchingcited by 30
- 2022DiffPoseNet: Direct Differentiable Camera Pose Estimationcited by 27
- 2021DenseGAP: Graph-Structured Dense Correspondence Learning with Anchor Pointscited by 8
- 2018Fast and Accurate Camera Covariance Computation for Large 3D Reconstructioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.