Analyzing the Impact of Splicing Artifacts in Partially Fake Speech Signals
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Speech deepfake detection has recently gained significant attention within the multimedia forensics community. Related issues have also been explored, such as the identification of partially fake signals, i.e., tracks that include both real and fake speech segments. However, generating high-quality spliced audio is not as straightforward as it may appear. Spliced signals are typically created through basic signal concatenation. This process could introduce noticeable artifacts that can make the generated data easier to detect. We analyze spliced audio tracks resulting from signal concatenation, investigate their artifacts and assess whether such artifacts introduce any bias in existing datasets. Our findings reveal that by analyzing splicing artifacts, we can achieve a detection EER of 6.16% and 7.36% on PartialSpoof and HAD datasets, respectively, without needing to train any detector. These results underscore the complexities of generating reliable spliced audio data and lead to discussions that can help improve future research in this area.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2024.
Builds on
15 of 22 references.
References · 15
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
- 2020End-to-end anti-spoofing with RawNet2cited by 160
- 2015A Light CNN for Deep Face Representation with Noisy Labelscited by 126
- 2022ADD 2022: the First Audio Deep Synthesis Detection Challengecited by 94
- 2024ASVspoof 5: Crowdsourced Speech Data, Deepfakes, and Adversarial Attacks at Scalecited by 88
- 2022The PartialSpoof Database and Countermeasures for the Detection of Short Fake Speech Segments Embedded in an Utterancecited by 47
- 2021Half-Truth: A Partially Fake Audio Detection Datasetcited by 44
- 2021An Initial Investigation for Detecting Partially Spoofed Audiocited by 27
- 2024A Survey on Speech Deepfake Detectioncited by 26
- 2021Channel-wise Gated Res2Net: Towards Robust Detection of Synthetic Speech Attackscited by 18
- 2021Multi-Task Learning in Utterance-Level and Segmental-Level Spoof Detectioncited by 16
- 2022Waveform Boundary Detection for Partially Spoofed Audiocited by 15
3 more
- 2024How Do Neural Spoofing Countermeasures Detect Partially Spoofed Audio?cited by 10
- 2022Open Challenges in Synthetic Speech Detectioncited by 5
- 2023Range-Based Equal Error Rate for Spoof Localizationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Towards Quantifying and Reducing Language Mismatch Effects in Cross-Lingual Speech Anti-Spoofingcited by 7
- 2025DeePen: Penetration Testing for Audio Deepfake Detectioncited by 1
- 2026Toward Fine-Grained Speech Inpainting Forensics:A Dataset, Method, and Metric for Multi-Region Tampering Localizationcited by 0
- 2026PC-Mix: Partial-Component Audio Spoofing Detection under Mixed Speech and Environmental Sound Conditionscited by 0
- 2026PC-Mix: Partial-Component Audio Spoofing Detection under Mixed Speech and Environmental Sound Conditions11 Jul 2026
- 2026Toward Fine-Grained Speech Inpainting Forensics:A Dataset, Method, and Metric for Multi-Region Tampering Localization4 May 2026
- 2025DeePen: Penetration Testing for Audio Deepfake Detection27 Feb 2025
- 2024Towards Quantifying and Reducing Language Mismatch Effects in Cross-Lingual Speech Anti-Spoofing12 Sep 2024