Generative Active Testing: Efficient LLM Evaluation via Proxy Task Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the widespread adoption of pre-trained Large Language Models (LLM), there exists a high demand for task-specific test sets to benchmark their performance in domains such as healthcare and biomedicine. However, the cost of labeling test samples while developing new benchmarks poses a significant challenge, especially when expert annotators are required. Existing frameworks for active sample selection offer limited support for generative Question Answering tasks, where option dynamics can affect model decision boundaries. In this paper, we present Generative Active Testing (GAT), an uncertainty-aware acquisition framework leveraging LLMs as surrogates for informing the sample selection process. Using a novel Statement Adaptation Module, we modify generative tasks into a pseudo-classification format, enabling the capture of sample-level uncertainties across unlabeled candidates. Our zero-shot acquisition functions reduce estimation error by ~40% compared to traditional sampling baselines, offering a scalable solution for cost-effective model benchmarking.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2026.
Builds on
20 of 28 references.
References · 20
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,324
- 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,271
- 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 295
- 2021Active Testing: Sample-Efficient Model Evaluationcited by 82
- 2021On Statistical Bias In Active Learning: How and When To Fix Itcited by 72
- 2021Can NLI Models Verify QA Systems' Predictions?cited by 46
- 2022Active Surrogate Estimators: An Active Learning Approach to Label-Efficient Model Evaluationcited by 26
8 more
- 2022Learning Distinctive Margin toward Active Domain Adaptationcited by 18
- 2024Label-Efficient Model Selection for Text Generationcited by 17
- 2024AcTracer: Active Testing of Large Language Model via Multi-Stage Samplingcited by 16
- 2024Are Machines Better at Complex Reasoning? Unveiling Human-Machine Inference Gaps in Entailment Verificationcited by 13
- 2025Scaling Up Active Testing to Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2024FlashEval: Towards Fast and Accurate Evaluation of Text-to-image Diffusion Generative Modelscited by 11
- 2024Advancing Healthcare Automation: Multi-Agent System for Medical Necessity Justificationcited by 10
- 2024Can GPT Improve the State of Prior Authorization via Guideline Based Automated Question Answering?cited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.