Infrequent Resolving Algorithm for Online Linear Programming
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Online linear programming (OLP) has gained significant attention from both researchers and practitioners due to its extensive applications such as online auctions, network revenue management, order fulfillment and advertising. Existing OLP algorithms fall into two categories: LP-based algorithms and LP-free algorithms. The former typically guarantees better performance but requires solving a large number of LPs, which could be computationally expensive. In contrast, LP-free algorithms only require first-order computations but induce a worse performance. In this work, we bridge the gap between these two extremes by proposing a well-performing algorithm that solves LPs at a few selected time points and conducts first-order computations at other time points. Specifically, for the case where the inputs are drawn from an unknown finite-support distribution, the proposed algorithm achieves a constant regret (even for the hard "degenerate" case) while solving LPs only O(loglog T) times over the time horizon T. Moreover, when we are allowed to solve LPs only M times, we design the corresponding schedule such that the proposed algorithm can guarantee a nearly Oleft(T^(1/2)M-1right) regret. Our work highlights the value of resolving both at the beginning and the end of the selling horizon, and provides a novel framework to prove the performance guarantee of the proposed policy under different infrequent resolving schedules. Numerical experiments are conducted to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed algorithms. The code is available at https://github.com/guokai-li/infrequentresolvingolp.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2024.
Builds on
24 of 62 references.
References · 24
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2019Batched Multi-armed Bandits Problemcited by 97
- 2020Sequential Batch Learning in Finite-Action Linear Contextual Banditscited by 63
- 2020The Best of Many Worlds: Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation Problemscited by 58
- 2020Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation Problemscited by 51
- 2020Linear Bandits with Limited Adaptivity and Learning Distributional Optimal Designcited by 51
- 2019Online Linear Programming: Dual Convergence, New Algorithms, and Regret Boundscited by 31
- 2020Dynamic Batch Learning in High-Dimensional Sparse Linear Contextual Banditscited by 28
- 2020Simple and Fast Algorithm for Binary Integer and Online Linear Programmingcited by 27
- 2020Online Stochastic Optimization with Wasserstein Based Non-stationaritycited by 25
- 2017Uniformly bounded regret in the multi-secretary problemcited by 19
- 2018A Re-solving Heuristic with Uniformly Bounded Loss for Network Revenue Managementcited by 18
12 more
- 2013Primal Beats Dual on Online Packing LPs in the Random-Order Modelcited by 17
- 2019Online Allocation and Pricing: Constant Regret via Bellman Inequalitiescited by 16
- 2019The Bayesian Prophet: A Low-Regret Framework for Online Decision Makingcited by 13
- 2021An Improved Analysis of LP-based Control for Revenue Managementcited by 13
- 2022Degeneracy is OK: Logarithmic Regret for Network Revenue Management with Indiscrete Distributionscited by 13
- 2020Near-Optimal Primal-Dual Algorithms for Quantity-Based Network Revenue Managementcited by 9
- 2019Logarithmic Regret in Multisecretary and Online Linear Programs with Continuous Valuationscited by 8
- 2022Optimal Regularized Online Allocation by Adaptive Re-Solvingcited by 8
- 2021Greedy Algorithm for Multiway Matching with Bounded Regretcited by 7
- 2021Solving Linear Programs with Fast Online Learning Algorithmscited by 4
- 2022Dynamic Resource Allocation: Algorithmic Design Principles and Spectrum of Achievable Performancescited by 4
- 2022Analysis of Dual-Based PID Controllers through Convolutional Mirror Descentcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
7 papers.
- 2025Beyond O(√T) Regret: Decoupling Learning and Decision-making in Online Linear Programmingcited by 3
- 2024Wait-Less Offline Tuning and Re-solving for Online Decision Makingcited by 1
- 2026Tight Lower Bounds for the Multi-Secretary Problem via Bellman Certificatescited by 0
- 2026Resource-Adaptive Primal-Dual Learning for One-Warehouse Multi-Store Systems with Censored Demandcited by 0
- 2026A First-Order Learning Algorithm for Online Resource Allocation with Constant Regretcited by 0
- 2026Resource-Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Descent for Online Linear Programming without Re-solvingcited by 0
- 2026Online Resource Allocation with an Endogenous Markov State: Fewer LP Solves Earn Morecited by 0
- 2026Online Resource Allocation with an Endogenous Markov State: Fewer LP Solves Earn More7 Oct 2026
- 2026Resource-Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Descent for Online Linear Programming without Re-solving23 Sep 2026
- 2026A First-Order Learning Algorithm for Online Resource Allocation with Constant Regret5 Sep 2026
- 2026Resource-Adaptive Primal-Dual Learning for One-Warehouse Multi-Store Systems with Censored Demand14 Aug 2026
- 2026Tight Lower Bounds for the Multi-Secretary Problem via Bellman Certificates2 Jul 2026
- 2025Beyond O(√T) Regret: Decoupling Learning and Decision-making in Online Linear Programming6 Jan 2025
- 2024Wait-Less Offline Tuning and Re-solving for Online Decision Making12 Dec 2024