mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Improved Analysis of LP-based Control for Revenue Management

arXiv 2101.11092 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2021math.OCcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we study a class of revenue management problems where the decision maker aims to maximize the total revenue subject to budget constraints on multiple type of resources over a finite horizon. At each time, a new order/customer/bid is revealed with a request of some resource(s) and a reward, and the decision maker needs to either accept or reject the order. Upon the acceptance of the order, the resource request must be satisfied and the associated revenue (reward) can be collected. We consider a stochastic setting where all the orders are i.i.d. sampled, i.e., the reward-request pair at each time is drawn from an unknown distribution with finite support. The formulation contains many classic applications such as the quantity-based network revenue management problem and the Adwords problem. We focus on the classic LP-based adaptive algorithm and consider regret as the performance measure defined by the gap between the optimal objective value of the certainty-equivalent linear program (LP) and the expected revenue obtained by the online algorithm. Our contribution is two-fold: (i) when the underlying LP is nondegenerate, the algorithm achieves a problem-dependent regret upper bound that is independent of the horizon/number of time periods T; (ii) when the underlying LP is degenerate, the algorithm achieves a regret upper bound that scales on the order of √Tlog T. To our knowledge, both results are new and improve the best existing bounds for the LP-based adaptive algorithm in the corresponding setting. We conclude with numerical experiments to further demonstrate our findings.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: