mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Analysis of Dual-Based PID Controllers through Convolutional Mirror Descent

arXiv 2202.06152 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2022math.OC cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dual-based proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers are often employed in practice to solve online allocation problems with global constraints, such as budget pacing in online advertising. However, controllers are used in a heuristic fashion and come with no provable guarantees on their performance. This paper provides the first regret bounds on the performance of dual-based PID controllers for online allocation problems. We do so by first establishing a fundamental connection between dual-based PID controllers and a new first-order algorithm for online convex optimization called Convolutional Mirror Descent (CMD), which updates iterates based on a weighted moving average of past gradients. CMD recovers, in a special case, online mirror descent with momentum and optimistic mirror descent. We establish sufficient conditions under which CMD attains low regret for general online convex optimization problems with adversarial inputs. We leverage this new result to give the first regret bound for dual-based PID controllers for online allocation problems. As a byproduct of our proofs, we provide the first regret bound for CMD for non-smooth convex optimization, which might be of independent interest.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2022.

Builds on

20 of 58 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
  2. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
  3. 2017Training GANs with Optimismcited by 217
  4. 2015A Differential Equation for Modeling Nesterov's Accelerated Gradient Method: Theory and Insightscited by 203
  5. 2019A Unified Analysis of Extra-gradient and Optimistic Gradient Methods for Saddle Point Problems: Proximal Point Approachcited by 142
  6. 2018The Limit Points of (Optimistic) Gradient Descent in Min-Max Optimizationcited by 98
  7. 2018Closing the Generalization Gap of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Training Deep Neural Networkscited by 89
  8. 2014Linear Coupling: An Ultimate Unification of Gradient and Mirror Descentcited by 58
  9. 2020The Best of Many Worlds: Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation Problemscited by 58
  10. 2020Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation Problemscited by 51
  11. 2019Bid Optimization by Multivariable Control in Display Advertisingcited by 37
  12. 2020A new regret analysis for Adam-type algorithmscited by 35
8 more
  1. 2020Simple and Fast Algorithm for Binary Integer and Online Linear Programmingcited by 27
  2. 2016Feedback Control of Real-Time Display Advertisingcited by 22
  3. 2015A geometric alternative to Nesterov's accelerated gradient descentcited by 21
  4. 2013Primal Beats Dual on Online Packing LPs in the Random-Order Modelcited by 17
  5. 2017Multiplicative Pacing Equilibria in Auction Marketscited by 16
  6. 2018Nostalgic Adam: Weighting more of the past gradients when designing the adaptive learning ratecited by 16
  7. 2014How the Experts Algorithm Can Help Solve LPs Onlinecited by 11
  8. 2020Dynamic Bidding Strategies with Multivariate Feedback Control for Multiple Goals in Display Advertisingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.