Dynamic Resource Allocation: Algorithmic Design Principles and Spectrum of Achievable Performances
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dynamic resource allocation problems are ubiquitous, arising in inventory management, order fulfillment, online advertising, and other applications. We initially focus on one of the simplest models of online resource allocation: the multisecretary problem. In the multisecretary problem, a decision maker sequentially hires up to B out of T candidates, and candidate ability values are drawn i.i.d. from a distribution F on [0,1]. First, we investigate fundamental limits on performance as a function of the value distribution under consideration. We quantify performance in terms of regret, defined as the additive loss relative to the best performance achievable in hindsight. We present a novel fundamental regret lower bound scaling of Omega(T1/2 - 1/2(1 + β)) for distributions with gaps in their support, with β quantifying the mass accumulation of types (values) around these gaps. This lower bound contrasts with the constant and logarithmic regret guarantees shown to be achievable in prior work, under specific assumptions on the value distribution. Second, we introduce a novel algorithmic principle, Conservativeness with respect to Gaps (CwG), which yields near-optimal performance with regret scaling of tildeO(T1/2 - 1/2(1 + β)) for any distribution in a class parameterized by the mass accumulation parameter β. We then turn to operationalizing the CwG principle across dynamic resource allocation problems. We study a general and practical algorithm, Repeatedly Act using Multiple Simulations (RAMS), which simulates possible futures to estimate a hindsight-based approximation of the value-to-go function. We establish that this algorithm inherits theoretical performance guarantees of algorithms tailored to the distribution of resource requests, including our CwG-based algorithm, and find that it outperforms them in numerical experiments.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 May 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Infrequent Resolving Algorithm for Online Linear Programmingcited by 7
- 2024Survey of Data-driven Newsvendor: Unified Analysis and Spectrum of Achievable Regretscited by 0
- 2026Tight Lower Bounds for the Multi-Secretary Problem via Bellman Certificatescited by 0
- 2026A First-Order Learning Algorithm for Online Resource Allocation with Constant Regretcited by 0
- 2026A First-Order Learning Algorithm for Online Resource Allocation with Constant Regret5 Sep 2026
- 2026Tight Lower Bounds for the Multi-Secretary Problem via Bellman Certificates2 Jul 2026
- 2024Survey of Data-driven Newsvendor: Unified Analysis and Spectrum of Achievable Regrets5 Sep 2024
- 2024Infrequent Resolving Algorithm for Online Linear Programming1 Aug 2024