Tight Lower Bounds for the Multi-Secretary Problem via Bellman Certificates
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper studies additive regret in the multi-secretary problem, defined as the gap between the expected offline prophet reward and the reward of the best online policy. Prior work established (O(log T)) regret for bounded-density distributions with connected support and (O((log T)2)) upper bounds for bounded-density distributions with support gaps. It was unknown whether the extra logarithmic factor is necessary even in the one-resource model. We prove that it is necessary. For a mixture of two separated uniform distributions at the critical capacity, the optimal regret grows at least on the order of ((log T)2). Thus the existing (O((log T)2)) upper bounds for bounded-density gapped instances, including those implied by network revenue management models with continuous rewards, are tight in this simplest specialization. The same framework also yields a matching lower bound for gapped distributions whose gap-facing densities vanish near the support edges; this companion result is given in the appendix. The proofs use Bellman certificates: feasible solutions to a relaxation of the exact Bellman recursion. This framework converts lower bounds into explicit certificate constructions and identifies why support gaps permit larger regret.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.
Builds on
18 of 34 references.
References · 18
- 2019Online Linear Programming: Dual Convergence, New Algorithms, and Regret Boundscited by 31
- 2017Uniformly bounded regret in the multi-secretary problemcited by 19
- 2018A Re-solving Heuristic with Uniformly Bounded Loss for Network Revenue Managementcited by 18
- 2019Online Allocation and Pricing: Constant Regret via Bellman Inequalitiescited by 16
- 2019The Bayesian Prophet: A Low-Regret Framework for Online Decision Makingcited by 13
- 2021An Improved Analysis of LP-based Control for Revenue Managementcited by 13
- 2022Degeneracy is OK: Logarithmic Regret for Network Revenue Management with Indiscrete Distributionscited by 13
- 2019Logarithmic Regret in Multisecretary and Online Linear Programs with Continuous Valuationscited by 8
- 2020Online Resource Allocation with Stochastic Resource Consumptioncited by 8
- 2021Greedy Algorithm for Multiway Matching with Bounded Regretcited by 7
- 2024Infrequent Resolving Algorithm for Online Linear Programmingcited by 7
- 2018Logarithmic regret in the dynamic and stochastic knapsack problem with equal rewardscited by 6
6 more
- 2021Tight Guarantees for Multi-unit Prophet Inequalities and Online Stochastic Knapsackcited by 6
- 2022Dynamic Resource Allocation: Algorithmic Design Principles and Spectrum of Achievable Performancescited by 4
- 2025Beyond O(√T) Regret: Decoupling Learning and Decision-making in Online Linear Programmingcited by 3
- 2022Overbooking with bounded losscited by 2
- 2025Beyond Non-Degeneracy: Revisiting Certainty Equivalent Heuristic for Online Linear Programmingcited by 2
- 2022Tightness without Counterexamples: A New Approach and New Results for Prophet Inequalitiescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.