The Inter-Intra Modal Measure: A Predictive Lens on Fine-Tuning Outcomes in Vision-Language Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning
Abstract (arXiv)
The fine-tuning of large vision-language foundation models remains an underexplored area, particularly regarding its impact on learning gains and catastrophic forgetting. Inspired by the significance of modality gaps in contrastive dual-encoders, we introduce the Inter-Intra Modal Measure (IIMM) - a predictive metric that quantifies the relationship between intra-modal image embedding similarity and inter-modal misalignment. Through extensive empirical analysis across four state-of-the-art vision-language models and five fine-tuning techniques, we establish a strong linear relationship: tasks with higher IIMM scores yield greater in-domain performance improvements but suffer from more pronounced out-of-domain degradation, with some parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods exhibiting severe forgetting. Compared to existing transferability measures, the IIMM demonstrates significantly stronger predictive power for accuracy changes post fine-tuning in dual-encoder models. Moreover, we provide a theoretical bound, proving that changes in IIMM are limited by the Wasserstein distance between pre- and post-fine-tuning embedding distributions, ensuring its stability and robustness as a predictive measure. With only a single forward pass of the target data, practitioners can leverage this key insight to evaluate the degree to which a model can be expected to improve following fine-tuning. When combined with prior knowledge of a model's performance across diverse tasks, the IIMM further enhances transferability predictions for novel tasks, offering a lightweight yet effective tool for guiding model adaptation strategies. Our code is provided at https://github.com/mit-ll/IIMM.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 47 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2024.
Builds on
47 of 63 references.
References · 47
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
- 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,612
- 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
- 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,265
- 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
35 more
- 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapterscited by 1,021
- 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 791
- 2020Contrastive Learning of Medical Visual Representations from Paired Images and Textcited by 636
- 2021VideoCLIP: Contrastive Pre-training for Zero-shot Video-Text Understandingcited by 596
- 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 553
- 2023EVA-02: A Visual Representation for Neon Genesiscited by 377
- 2022Visual Classification via Description from Large Language Modelscited by 331
- 2024Boosting Continual Learning of Vision-Language Models via Mixture-of-Experts Adapterscited by 199
- 2020LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned Representationscited by 182
- 2018Large Scale Fine-Grained Categorization and Domain-Specific Transfer Learningcited by 174
- 2021LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learningcited by 168
- 2019Transferability and Hardness of Supervised Classification Taskscited by 125
- 2023Preventing Zero-Shot Transfer Degradation in Continual Learning of Vision-Language Modelscited by 112
- 2023Foundational Models Defining a New Era in Vision: A Survey and Outlookcited by 109
- 2023Waffling around for Performance: Visual Classification with Random Words and Broad Conceptscited by 100
- 2023Fine-tuning can cripple your foundation model; preserving features may be the solutioncited by 92
- 2019Representation Similarity Analysis for Efficient Task taxonomy & Transfer Learningcited by 86
- 2022An Information-Theoretic Approach to Transferability in Task Transfer Learningcited by 79
- 2022CLiMB: A Continual Learning Benchmark for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 68
- 2022Don't Stop Learning: Towards Continual Learning for the CLIP Modelcited by 61
- 2021Frustratingly Easy Transferability Estimationcited by 44
- 2023Are Natural Domain Foundation Models Useful for Medical Image Classification?cited by 44
- 2023Continual Vision-Language Representation Learning with Off-Diagonal Informationcited by 40
- 2022Not All Models Are Equal: Predicting Model Transferability in a Self-challenging Fisher Spacecited by 30
- 2021How Well Does Self-Supervised Pre-Training Perform with Streaming Data?cited by 29
- 2023Foundation Model is Efficient Multimodal Multitask Model Selectorcited by 16
- 2024Which Model to Transfer? A Survey on Transferability Estimationcited by 13
- 2023LOVM: Language-Only Vision Model Selectioncited by 12
- 2021Self-Supervised Class Incremental Learningcited by 8
- 2023Robust Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models for Domain Generalizationcited by 7
- 2023Descriptor and Word Soups: Overcoming the Parameter Efficiency Accuracy Tradeoff for Out-of-Distribution Few-shot Learningcited by 6
- 2022A Unified Continuous Learning Framework for Multi-modal Knowledge Discovery and Pre-trainingcited by 5
- 2024Image-Caption Encoding for Improving Zero-Shot Generalizationcited by 5
- 2024When are Foundation Models Effective? Understanding the Suitability for Pixel-Level Classification Using Multispectral Imagerycited by 5
- 2024Multimodal Unsupervised Domain Generalization by Retrieving Across the Modality Gapcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025CHAOS: Chart Analysis with Outlier Samplescited by 1
- 2025CHAOS: Chart Analysis with Outlier Samples22 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Understanding Cross-Modal Contributions in Continual Vision-Language Models: A Theoretical Perspective
- 2024Deciphering Cross-Modal Alignment in Large Vision-Language Models with Modality Integration Rate
- 2026A Strong Baseline for Evaluating Vision Encoders in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025Efficiently Integrate Large Language Models with Visual Perception: A Survey from the Training Paradigm Perspective
- 2025Cross the Gap: Exposing the Intra-modal Misalignment in CLIP via Modality Inversion
- 2025Infusing fine-grained visual knowledge to Vision-Language Models
- 2023Understanding and Constructing Latent Modality Structures in Multi-modal Representation Learning
- 2025Beyond Cross-Modal Alignment: Measuring and Leveraging Modality Gap in Vision-Language Models