mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Strong Baseline for Evaluating Vision Encoders in Multimodal Large Language Models

arXiv 2610.05413 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning also fits: VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating vision encoders requires metrics that reliably predict their downstream performance in multimodal large language models (MLLMs). Although recent studies have shown that cross-modal metrics can better capture such performance, unimodal metrics remain the dominant choice in practice. In this work, we revisit cross-modal evaluation of vision encoders through large-scale experiments. We identify important limitations in both the experimental design and methodological formulation of prior approaches. After addressing these limitations and introducing simple improvements, we propose RAVEL, a training-free method based on cross-modal nearest-neighbor retrieval. Despite its simplicity, RAVEL achieves state-of-the-art performance across our experiments, outperforming prior methods by a substantial margin. Our results demonstrate that simple cross-modal metrics, when evaluated under a careful and comprehensive setup, can provide a strong basis for evaluating vision encoders for MLLMs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Expanding the Boundaries of Vision Prior Knowledge in Multi-modal Large Language Models
  2. 2024Law of Vision Representation in MLLMs
  3. 2024Deciphering Cross-Modal Alignment in Large Vision-Language Models with Modality Integration Rate
  4. 2023ReForm-Eval: Evaluating Large Vision Language Models via Unified Re-Formulation of Task-Oriented Benchmarks
  5. 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling
  6. 2026Scaling Vision-Language Models Is Not Enough to Mitigate Bias
  7. 2025Investigating Redundancy in Multimodal Large Language Models with Multiple Vision Encoders
  8. 2025Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Fine-Grained Image Tasks: A Comprehensive Evaluation