mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Self-Supervised Class Incremental Learning

arXiv 2111.11208 ↗First posted 18 Nov 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing Class Incremental Learning (CIL) methods are based on a supervised classification framework sensitive to data labels. When updating them based on the new class data, they suffer from catastrophic forgetting: the model cannot discern old class data clearly from the new. In this paper, we explore the performance of Self-Supervised representation learning in Class Incremental Learning (SSCIL) for the first time, which discards data labels and the model's classifiers. To comprehensively discuss the difference in performance between supervised and self-supervised methods in CIL, we set up three different class incremental schemes: Random Class Scheme, Semantic Class Scheme, and Cluster Scheme, to simulate various class incremental learning scenarios. Besides, we propose Linear Evaluation Protocol (LEP) and Generalization Evaluation Protocol (GEP) to metric the model's representation classification ability and generalization in CIL. Our experiments (on ImageNet-100 and ImageNet) show that SSCIL has better anti-forgetting ability and robustness than supervised strategies in CIL. To understand what alleviates the catastrophic forgetting in SSCIL, we study the major components of SSCIL and conclude that (1) the composition of different data augmentation improves the quality of the model's representation and the textitGrayscale operation reduces the system noise of data augmentation in SSCIL. (2) the projector, like a buffer, reduces unnecessary parameter updates of the model in SSCIL and increases the robustness of the model. Although the performance of SSCIL is significantly higher than supervised methods in CIL, there is still an apparent gap with joint learning. Our exploration gives a baseline of self-supervised class incremental learning on large-scale datasets and contributes some forward strategies for mitigating the catastrophic forgetting in CIL.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2021.

Builds on

26 of 35 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  5. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  6. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  7. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  8. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  9. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
  10. 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
  11. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,845
  12. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
14 more
  1. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,591
  2. 2019Contrastive Representation Distillationcited by 748
  3. 2019Learning Representations by Maximizing Mutual Information Across Viewscited by 734
  4. 2019Large Scale Incremental Learningcited by 732
  5. 2013An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networkscited by 722
  6. 2019Data-Efficient Image Recognition with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 673
  7. 2018End-to-End Incremental Learningcited by 597
  8. 2016Learning Representations for Automatic Colorizationcited by 251
  9. 2019Continual Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 147
  10. 2021Toward Understanding the Feature Learning Process of Self-supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 119
  11. 2021Distilling Causal Effect of Data in Class-Incremental Learningcited by 117
  12. 2020Incremental Learning In Online Scenariocited by 71
  13. 2021Self-Supervised Training Enhances Online Continual Learningcited by 54
  14. 2020Memory Efficient Class-Incremental Learning for Image Classificationcited by 50

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

8 papers.