mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Predicting the Best of N Visual Trackers

arXiv 2407.15707 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2024cs.CV cs.AI eess.IVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We observe that the performance of SOTA visual trackers surprisingly strongly varies across different video attributes and datasets. No single tracker remains the best performer across all tracking attributes and datasets. To bridge this gap, for a given video sequence, we predict the "Best of the N Trackers", called the BofN meta-tracker. At its core, a Tracking Performance Prediction Network (TP2N) selects a predicted best performing visual tracker for the given video sequence using only a few initial frames. We also introduce a frame-level BofN meta-tracker which keeps predicting best performer after regular temporal intervals. The TP2N is based on self-supervised learning architectures MocoV2, SwAv, BT, and DINO; experiments show that the DINO with ViT-S as a backbone performs the best. The video-level BofN meta-tracker outperforms, by a large margin, existing SOTA trackers on nine standard benchmarks - LaSOT, TrackingNet, GOT-10K, VOT2019, VOT2021, VOT2022, UAV123, OTB100, and WebUAV-3M. Further improvement is achieved by the frame-level BofN meta-tracker effectively handling variations in the tracking scenarios within long sequences. For instance, on GOT-10k, BofN meta-tracker average overlap is 88.7% and 91.1% with video and frame-level settings respectively. The best performing tracker, RTS, achieves 85.20% AO. On VOT2022, BofN expected average overlap is 67.88% and 70.98% with video and frame level settings, compared to the best performing ARTrack, 64.12%. This work also presents an extensive evaluation of competitive tracking methods on all commonly used benchmarks, following their protocols. The code, the trained models, and the results will soon be made publicly available on https://github.com/BasitAlawode/Best_of_N_Trackers.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2024.

Builds on

44 of 74 references.

References · 44

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  4. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  5. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  6. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  7. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  8. 2016Fully-Convolutional Siamese Networks for Object Trackingcited by 568
  9. 2017Large Batch Training of Convolutional Networkscited by 535
  10. 2018GOT-10k: A Large High-Diversity Benchmark for Generic Object Tracking in the Wildcited by 475
  11. 2018SiamRPN++: Evolution of Siamese Visual Tracking with Very Deep Networkscited by 446
  12. 2018LaSOT: A High-quality Benchmark for Large-scale Single Object Trackingcited by 429
32 more
  1. 2021Transformer Trackingcited by 412
  2. 2018HoVer-Net: Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Nuclei in Multi-Tissue Histology Imagescited by 388
  3. 2021Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Trackingcited by 350
  4. 2018TrackingNet: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark for Object Tracking in the Wildcited by 343
  5. 2022Joint Feature Learning and Relation Modeling for Tracking: A One-Stream Frameworkcited by 330
  6. 2022MixFormer: End-to-End Tracking with Iterative Mixed Attentioncited by 281
  7. 2020Ocean: Object-aware Anchor-free Trackingcited by 212
  8. 2015Learning Multi-Domain Convolutional Neural Networks for Visual Trackingcited by 209
  9. 2022AiATrack: Attention in Attention for Transformer Visual Trackingcited by 137
  10. 2021Learning Target Candidate Association to Keep Track of What Not to Trackcited by 131
  11. 2021SwinTrack: A Simple and Strong Baseline for Transformer Trackingcited by 126
  12. 2022Backbone is All Your Need: A Simplified Architecture for Visual Object Trackingcited by 119
  13. 2022Transforming Model Prediction for Trackingcited by 117
  14. 2023Generalized Relation Modeling for Transformer Trackingcited by 93
  15. 2017End-to-end representation learning for Correlation Filter based trackingcited by 90
  16. 2021Divide and Contrast: Self-supervised Learning from Uncurated Datacited by 85
  17. 2020High-Performance Long-Term Tracking with Meta-Updatercited by 80
  18. 2018Siamese Cascaded Region Proposal Networks for Real-Time Visual Trackingcited by 65
  19. 2018A Twofold Siamese Network for Real-Time Object Trackingcited by 62
  20. 2016Siamese Instance Search for Trackingcited by 60
  21. 2018MDLatLRR: A novel decomposition method for infrared and visible image fusioncited by 54
  22. 2016Discriminative Scale Space Trackingcited by 46
  23. 2021Visual Object Tracking with Discriminative Filters and Siamese Networks: A Survey and Outlookcited by 46
  24. 2018Unveiling the Power of Deep Trackingcited by 41
  25. 2022Robust Visual Tracking by Segmentationcited by 38
  26. 2023CiteTracker: Correlating Image and Text for Visual Trackingcited by 36
  27. 2022WebUAV-3M: A Benchmark for Unveiling the Power of Million-Scale Deep UAV Trackingcited by 26
  28. 2022Exploring Fusion Strategies for Accurate RGBT Visual Object Trackingcited by 26
  29. 2022Graph Neural Network for Cell Tracking in Microscopy Videoscited by 19
  30. 2019Joint Group Feature Selection and Discriminative Filter Learning for Robust Visual Object Trackingcited by 17
  31. 2023Transformers in Single Object Tracking: An Experimental Surveycited by 10
  32. 2018Parallel Tracking and Verifyingcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.