mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CEBench: A Benchmarking Toolkit for the Cost-Effectiveness of LLM Pipelines

arXiv 2407.12797 ↗First posted 20 Jun 2024cs.PF cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Online Large Language Model (LLM) services such as ChatGPT and Claude 3 have transformed business operations and academic research by effortlessly enabling new opportunities. However, due to data-sharing restrictions, sectors such as healthcare and finance prefer to deploy local LLM applications using costly hardware resources. This scenario requires a balance between the effectiveness advantages of LLMs and significant financial burdens. Additionally, the rapid evolution of models increases the frequency and redundancy of benchmarking efforts. Existing benchmarking toolkits, which typically focus on effectiveness, often overlook economic considerations, making their findings less applicable to practical scenarios. To address these challenges, we introduce CEBench, an open-source toolkit specifically designed for multi-objective benchmarking that focuses on the critical trade-offs between expenditure and effectiveness required for LLM deployments. CEBench allows for easy modifications through configuration files, enabling stakeholders to effectively assess and optimize these trade-offs. This strategic capability supports crucial decision-making processes aimed at maximizing effectiveness while minimizing cost impacts. By streamlining the evaluation process and emphasizing cost-effectiveness, CEBench seeks to facilitate the development of economically viable AI solutions across various industries and research fields. The code and demonstration are available in https://github.com/amademicnoboday12/CEBench.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2024.

Builds on

16 of 30 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  3. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
  4. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  5. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
  6. 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 713
  7. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 380
  8. 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 328
  9. 2023A Study of Generative Large Language Model for Medical Research and Healthcarecited by 160
  10. 2022A Survey on Retrieval-Augmented Text Generationcited by 157
  11. 2021ContractNLI: A Dataset for Document-level Natural Language Inference for Contractscited by 145
  12. 2023OpenICL: An Open-Source Framework for In-context Learningcited by 51
4 more
  1. 2023Leveraging Large Language Models to Power Chatbots for Collecting User Self-Reported Datacited by 48
  2. 2022A Survey on Model Compression and Acceleration for Pretrained Language Modelscited by 45
  3. 2024Better Call GPT, Comparing Large Language Models Against Lawyerscited by 25
  4. 2023LLMeBench: A Flexible Framework for Accelerating LLMs Benchmarkingcited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

11 papers.