mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Weakly Supervised Test-Time Domain Adaptation for Object Detection

arXiv 2407.05607 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2024cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prior to deployment, an object detector is trained on a dataset compiled from a previous data collection campaign. However, the environment in which the object detector is deployed will invariably evolve, particularly in outdoor settings where changes in lighting, weather and seasons will significantly affect the appearance of the scene and target objects. It is almost impossible for all potential scenarios that the object detector may come across to be present in a finite training dataset. This necessitates continuous updates to the object detector to maintain satisfactory performance. Test-time domain adaptation techniques enable machine learning models to self-adapt based on the distributions of the testing data. However, existing methods mainly focus on fully automated adaptation, which makes sense for applications such as self-driving cars. Despite the prevalence of fully automated approaches, in some applications such as surveillance, there is usually a human operator overseeing the system's operation. We propose to involve the operator in test-time domain adaptation to raise the performance of object detection beyond what is achievable by fully automated adaptation. To reduce manual effort, the proposed method only requires the operator to provide weak labels, which are then used to guide the adaptation process. Furthermore, the proposed method can be performed in a streaming setting, where each online sample is observed only once. We show that the proposed method outperforms existing works, demonstrating a great benefit of human-in-the-loop test-time domain adaptation. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/dzungdoan6/WSTTA

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2024.

Builds on

35 of 48 references.

References · 35

  1. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  2. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  3. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
  4. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
  5. 2018Domain Adaptive Faster R-CNN for Object Detection in the Wildcited by 442
  6. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  7. 2014Understanding Deep Image Representations by Inverting Themcited by 399
  8. 2017Joint Distribution Optimal Transportation for Domain Adaptationcited by 280
  9. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 258
  10. 2019Sliced Wasserstein Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 235
  11. 2018Cross-Domain Weakly-Supervised Object Detection through Progressive Domain Adaptationcited by 218
  12. 2015Weakly Supervised Deep Detection Networkscited by 183
23 more
  1. 2015Inverting Visual Representations with Convolutional Networkscited by 168
  2. 2017Mind the Class Weight Bias: Weighted Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 151
  3. 2021The Norm Must Go On: Dynamic Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Normalizationcited by 131
  4. 2021Cross-Domain Adaptive Teacher for Object Detectioncited by 125
  5. 2019Active Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 73
  6. 2022Back to the Source: Diffusion-Driven Test-Time Adaptationcited by 71
  7. 2019Revealing Scenes by Inverting Structure from Motion Reconstructionscited by 66
  8. 2019Automatic adaptation of object detectors to new domains using self-trainingcited by 66
  9. 2019Physics-Based Rendering for Improving Robustness to Raincited by 49
  10. 2021SODA10M: A Large-Scale 2D Self/Semi-Supervised Object Detection Dataset for Autonomous Drivingcited by 43
  11. 2022ActMAD: Activation Matching to Align Distributions for Test-Time-Trainingcited by 38
  12. 2020Boosting Weakly Supervised Object Detection with Progressive Knowledge Transfercited by 28
  13. 2022ConfMix: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Object Detection via Confidence-based Mixingcited by 28
  14. 2023Bi3D: Bi-domain Active Learning for Cross-domain 3D Object Detectioncited by 21
  15. 2023Streaming Active Learning with Deep Neural Networkscited by 20
  16. 2022Active Learning Strategies for Weakly-supervised Object Detectioncited by 17
  17. 2023What, How, and When Should Object Detectors Update in Continually Changing Test Domains?cited by 15
  18. 2023Divide and Adapt: Active Domain Adaptation via Customized Learningcited by 13
  19. 2019Wasserstein Distance Based Domain Adaptation for Object Detectioncited by 10
  20. 2020Object Detection in the Context of Mobile Augmented Realitycited by 4
  21. 2021CaT: Weakly Supervised Object Detection with Category Transfercited by 4
  22. 2021Burn After Reading: Online Adaptation for Cross-domain Streaming Datacited by 3
  23. 2023Assessing Domain Gap for Continual Domain Adaptation in Object Detectioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.